mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Black-Box Evaluation Framework for Semantic Robustness in Bird's Eye View Detection

arXiv 2412.13913 ↗First posted 18 Dec 2024cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Camera-based Bird's Eye View (BEV) perception models receive increasing attention for their crucial role in autonomous driving, a domain where concerns about the robustness and reliability of deep learning have been raised. While only a few works have investigated the effects of randomly generated semantic perturbations, aka natural corruptions, on the multi-view BEV detection task, we develop a black-box robustness evaluation framework that adversarially optimises three common semantic perturbations: geometric transformation, colour shifting, and motion blur, to deceive BEV models, serving as the first approach in this emerging field. To address the challenge posed by optimising the semantic perturbation, we design a smoothed, distance-based surrogate function to replace the mAP metric and introduce SimpleDIRECT, a deterministic optimisation algorithm that utilises observed slopes to guide the optimisation process. By comparing with randomised perturbation and two optimisation baselines, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Additionally, we provide a benchmark on the semantic robustness of ten recent BEV models. The results reveal that PolarFormer, which emphasises geometric information from multi-view images, exhibits the highest robustness, whereas BEVDet is fully compromised, with its precision reduced to zero.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2024.

Builds on

26 of 38 references.

References · 26

  1. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  2. 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,429
  3. 2022BEVFormer: Learning Bird's-Eye-View Representation from Multi-Camera Images via Spatiotemporal Transformerscited by 1,218
  4. 2021BEVDet: High-performance Multi-camera 3D Object Detection in Bird-Eye-Viewcited by 713
  5. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 447
  6. 2021Multi-Modal Fusion Transformer for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 377
  7. 2022ST-P3: End-to-end Vision-based Autonomous Driving via Spatial-Temporal Feature Learningcited by 368
  8. 2019Kornia: an Open Source Differentiable Computer Vision Library for PyTorchcited by 232
  9. 2021NEAT: Neural Attention Fields for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 174
  10. 2022Model-Based Imitation Learning for Urban Drivingcited by 150
  11. 2022Learning from All Vehiclescited by 135
  12. 2023Robo3D: Towards Robust and Reliable 3D Perception against Corruptionscited by 129
14 more
  1. 2022Vision-Centric BEV Perception: A Surveycited by 126
  2. 2020TSS: Transformation-Specific Smoothing for Robustness Certificationcited by 49
  3. 2023RoboDepth: Robust Out-of-Distribution Depth Estimation under Corruptionscited by 49
  4. 2023RoboBEV: Towards Robust Bird's Eye View Perception under Corruptionscited by 42
  5. 2023Understanding the Robustness of 3D Object Detection with Bird's-Eye-View Representations in Autonomous Drivingcited by 37
  6. 2021Robustness of Object Detectors in Degrading Weather Conditionscited by 28
  7. 2021Evaluating Adversarial Attacks on Driving Safety in Vision-Based Autonomous Vehiclescited by 24
  8. 2022PRoA: A Probabilistic Robustness Assessment against Functional Perturbationscited by 19
  9. 2016Bayesian Optimization with Exponential Convergencecited by 18
  10. 2019Identifying Model Weakness with Adversarial Examinercited by 12
  11. 2022DIMBA: Discretely Masked Black-Box Attack in Single Object Trackingcited by 11
  12. 2023Towards Verifying the Geometric Robustness of Large-scale Neural Networkscited by 11
  13. 2020Large Norms of CNN Layers Do Not Hurt Adversarial Robustnesscited by 7
  14. 2021Sensor Adversarial Traits: Analyzing Robustness of 3D Object Detection Sensor Fusion Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.