Identifying Model Weakness with Adversarial Examiner
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning models are usually evaluated according to the average case performance on the test set. However, this is not always ideal, because in some sensitive domains (e.g. autonomous driving), it is the worst case performance that matters more. In this paper, we are interested in systematic exploration of the input data space to identify the weakness of the model to be evaluated. We propose to use an adversarial examiner in the testing stage. Different from the existing strategy to always give the same (distribution of) test data, the adversarial examiner will dynamically select the next test data to hand out based on the testing history so far, with the goal being to undermine the model's performance. This sequence of test data not only helps us understand the current model, but also serves as constructive feedback to help improve the model in the next iteration. We conduct experiments on ShapeNet object classification. We show that our adversarial examiner can successfully put more emphasis on the weakness of the model, preventing performance estimates from being overly optimistic.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2023SneakyPrompt: Jailbreaking Text-to-image Generative Modelscited by 189
- 2023Dataset Interfaces: Diagnosing Model Failures Using Controllable Counterfactual Generationcited by 35
- 20213DB: A Framework for Debugging Computer Vision Modelscited by 31
- 20233D-Aware Neural Body Fitting for Occlusion Robust 3D Human Pose Estimationcited by 28
- 2021Challenges for machine learning in clinical translation of big data imaging studiescited by 15
- 2021Simulated Adversarial Testing of Face Recognition Modelscited by 10
- 2023PoseExaminer: Automated Testing of Out-of-Distribution Robustness in Human Pose and Shape Estimationcited by 10
- 2022Human Body Measurement Estimation with Adversarial Augmentationcited by 3
- 2024A Black-Box Evaluation Framework for Semantic Robustness in Bird's Eye View Detectioncited by 3
- 2026LychSim: A Controllable and Interactive Simulation Framework for Vision Researchcited by 3
- 2025CNS-Bench: Benchmarking Image Classifier Robustness Under Continuous Nuisance Shiftscited by 2
- 2025High-Entropy Tokens as Multimodal Failure Points in Vision-Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026LychSim: A Controllable and Interactive Simulation Framework for Vision Research12 May 2026
- 2025High-Entropy Tokens as Multimodal Failure Points in Vision-Language Models26 Dec 2025
- 2025CNS-Bench: Benchmarking Image Classifier Robustness Under Continuous Nuisance Shifts23 Jul 2025
- 2024A Black-Box Evaluation Framework for Semantic Robustness in Bird's Eye View Detection18 Dec 2024
- 20233D-Aware Neural Body Fitting for Occlusion Robust 3D Human Pose Estimation19 Aug 2023
- 2023SneakyPrompt: Jailbreaking Text-to-image Generative Models20 May 2023
- 2023PoseExaminer: Automated Testing of Out-of-Distribution Robustness in Human Pose and Shape Estimation13 Mar 2023
- 2023Dataset Interfaces: Diagnosing Model Failures Using Controllable Counterfactual Generation15 Feb 2023
- 2022Human Body Measurement Estimation with Adversarial Augmentation11 Oct 2022
- 2021Challenges for machine learning in clinical translation of big data imaging studies7 Jul 2021
- 2021Simulated Adversarial Testing of Face Recognition Models8 Jun 2021
- 20213DB: A Framework for Debugging Computer Vision Models7 Jun 2021