mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Identifying Model Weakness with Adversarial Examiner

arXiv 1911.11230 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2019cs.CV cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models are usually evaluated according to the average case performance on the test set. However, this is not always ideal, because in some sensitive domains (e.g. autonomous driving), it is the worst case performance that matters more. In this paper, we are interested in systematic exploration of the input data space to identify the weakness of the model to be evaluated. We propose to use an adversarial examiner in the testing stage. Different from the existing strategy to always give the same (distribution of) test data, the adversarial examiner will dynamically select the next test data to hand out based on the testing history so far, with the goal being to undermine the model's performance. This sequence of test data not only helps us understand the current model, but also serves as constructive feedback to help improve the model in the next iteration. We conduct experiments on ShapeNet object classification. We show that our adversarial examiner can successfully put more emphasis on the weakness of the model, preventing performance estimates from being overly optimistic.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

12 papers.