Geodesic Flow Kernels for Semi-Supervised Learning on Mixed-Variable Tabular Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Tabular data poses unique challenges due to its heterogeneous nature, combining both continuous and categorical variables. Existing approaches often struggle to effectively capture the underlying structure and relationships within such data. We propose GFTab (Geodesic Flow Kernels for Semi- Supervised Learning on Mixed-Variable Tabular Dataset), a semi-supervised framework specifically designed for tabular datasets. GFTab incorporates three key innovations: 1) Variable-specific corruption methods tailored to the distinct properties of continuous and categorical variables, 2) A Geodesic flow kernel based similarity measure to capture geometric changes between corrupted inputs, and 3) Tree-based embedding to leverage hierarchical relationships from available labeled data. To rigorously evaluate GFTab, we curate a comprehensive set of 21 tabular datasets spanning various domains, sizes, and variable compositions. Our experimental results show that GFTab outperforms existing ML/DL models across many of these datasets, particularly in settings with limited labeled data.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2024.
Builds on
27 of 40 references.
References · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
- 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
- 2019Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecastingcited by 748
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
- 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
- 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
- 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 643
15 more
- 2020Pre-trained Models for Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 504
- 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 432
- 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 398
- 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 395
- 2019S4L: Self-Supervised Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 335
- 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 310
- 2019Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Datacited by 200
- 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 198
- 2021SCARF: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning using Random Feature Corruptioncited by 151
- 2021Self-Attention Between Datapoints: Going Beyond Individual Input-Output Pairs in Deep Learningcited by 112
- 2021TABBIE: Pretrained Representations of Tabular Datacited by 111
- 2021SubTab: Subsetting Features of Tabular Data for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 101
- 2021On Learning the Geodesic Path for Incremental Learningcited by 85
- 2018Strong Baselines for Neural Semi-supervised Learning under Domain Shiftcited by 39
- 2021TabGNN: Multiplex Graph Neural Network for Tabular Data Predictioncited by 26
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.