mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can Large Language Models Understand You Better? An MBTI Personality Detection Dataset Aligned with Population Traits

arXiv 2412.12510 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2024cs.CL cs.CYcited by 7

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is one of the most influential personality theories reflecting individual differences in thinking, feeling, and behaving. MBTI personality detection has garnered considerable research interest and has evolved significantly over the years. However, this task tends to be overly optimistic, as it currently does not align well with the natural distribution of population personality traits. Specifically, (1) the self-reported labels in existing datasets result in incorrect labeling issues, and (2) the hard labels fail to capture the full range of population personality distributions. In this paper, we optimize the task by constructing MBTIBench, the first manually annotated high-quality MBTI personality detection dataset with soft labels, under the guidance of psychologists. As for the first challenge, MBTIBench effectively solves the incorrect labeling issues, which account for 29.58% of the data. As for the second challenge, we estimate soft labels by deriving the polarity tendency of samples. The obtained soft labels confirm that there are more people with non-extreme personality traits. Experimental results not only highlight the polarized predictions and biases in LLMs as key directions for future research, but also confirm that soft labels can provide more benefits to other psychological tasks than hard labels. The code and data are available at https://github.com/Personality-NLP/MbtiBench.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 3 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2024.

Builds on

3 of 55 references.

References · 3

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Machine Mindset: An MBTI Exploration of Large Language Models
  2. 2025From Post To Personality: Harnessing LLMs for MBTI Prediction in Social Media
  3. 2026From Classification to Ranking: Enhancing LLM Reasoning Capabilities for MBTI Personality Detection
  4. 2026When Personality Meets Quantization: A Layer-wise MBTI Analysis of Quantized LLMs
  5. 2024Revealing Personality Traits: A New Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Personality Recognition on Dialogues
  6. 2026Large-Language-Models-as-a-Judge in Theory-Agnostic Adaptive Metric-Alignment for Prototypical Networks in Personality Recognition
  7. 2025EmoPerso: Enhancing Personality Detection with Self-Supervised Emotion-Aware Modelling
  8. 2023PsyCoT: Psychological Questionnaire as Powerful Chain-of-Thought for Personality Detection