From Classification to Ranking: Enhancing LLM Reasoning Capabilities for MBTI Personality Detection
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Personality detection aims to measure an individual's corresponding personality traits through their social media posts. The advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer novel perspectives for personality detection tasks. Existing approaches enhance personality trait analysis by leveraging LLMs to extract semantic information from textual posts as prompts, followed by training classifiers for categorization. However, accurately classifying personality traits remains challenging due to the inherent complexity of human personality and subtle inter-trait distinctions. Moreover, prompt-based methods often exhibit excessive dependency on expert-crafted knowledge without autonomous pattern-learning capacity. To address these limitations, we view personality detection as a ranking task rather than a classification and propose a corresponding reinforcement learning training paradigm. First, we employ supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to establish personality trait ranking capabilities while enforcing standardized output formats, creating a robust initialization. Subsequently, we introduce Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with a specialized ranking-based reward function. Unlike verification tasks with definitive solutions, personality assessment involves subjective interpretations and blurred boundaries between trait categories. Our reward function explicitly addresses this challenge by training LLMs to learn optimal answer rankings. Comprehensive experiments have demonstrated that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple personality detection benchmarks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.
Builds on
15 of 42 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May
Other references · 14
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 625
- 2025Logic-RL: Unleashing LLM Reasoning with Rule-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 262
- 2023Personality Traits in Large Language Modelscited by 169
- 2025Fin-R1: A Large Language Model for Financial Reasoning through Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
- 2019Myers-Briggs Personality Classification and Personality-Specific Language Generation Using Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 20
- 2025Think2SQL: Reinforce LLM Reasoning Capabilities for Text2SQLcited by 14
- 2025Less but Better: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models for Personality Detectioncited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Ask, Answer, and Detect: Role-Playing LLMs for Personality Detection with Question-Conditioned Mixture-of-Experts
- 2025Cognitive Alignment in Personality Reasoning: Leveraging Prototype Theory for MBTI Inference
- 2024P-React: Synthesizing Topic-Adaptive Reactions of Personality Traits via Mixture of Specialized LoRA Experts
- 2023Machine Mindset: An MBTI Exploration of Large Language Models
- 2025From Post To Personality: Harnessing LLMs for MBTI Prediction in Social Media
- 2026Mechanistic Personality Analysis of LLMs: Steering Personality via Latent Feature Interventions
- 2026When Personality Meets Quantization: A Layer-wise MBTI Analysis of Quantized LLMs
- 2023PsyCoT: Psychological Questionnaire as Powerful Chain-of-Thought for Personality Detection