mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Efficiently Achieving Secure Model Training and Secure Aggregation to Ensure Bidirectional Privacy-Preservation in Federated Learning

arXiv 2412.11737 ↗First posted 16 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bidirectional privacy-preservation federated learning is crucial as both local gradients and the global model may leak privacy. However, only a few works attempt to achieve it, and they often face challenges such as excessive communication and computational overheads, or significant degradation of model accuracy, which hinders their practical applications. In this paper, we design an efficient and high-accuracy bidirectional privacy-preserving scheme for federated learning to complete secure model training and secure aggregation. To efficiently achieve bidirectional privacy, we design an efficient and accuracy-lossless model perturbation method on the server side (called MPServer) that can be combined with local differential privacy (LDP) to prevent clients from accessing the model, while ensuring that the local gradients obtained on the server side satisfy LDP. Furthermore, to ensure model accuracy, we customize a distributed differential privacy mechanism on the client side (called DDPClient). When combined with MPServer, it ensures LDP of the local gradients, while ensuring that the aggregated result matches the accuracy of central differential privacy (CDP). Extensive experiments demonstrate that our scheme significantly outperforms state-of-the-art bidirectional privacy-preservation baselines (SOTAs) in terms of computational cost, model accuracy, and defense ability against privacy attacks. Particularly, given target accuracy, the training time of SOTAs is approximately 200 times, or even over 1000 times, longer than that of our scheme. When the privacy budget is set relatively small, our scheme incurs less than 6% accuracy loss compared to the privacy-ignoring method, while SOTAs suffer up to 20% accuracy loss. Experimental results also show that the defense capability of our scheme outperforms than SOTAs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2024.

Builds on

18 of 43 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  3. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  4. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  5. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  6. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
  7. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
  8. 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 210
  9. 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 164
  10. 2021LightSecAgg: a Lightweight and Versatile Design for Secure Aggregation in Federated Learningcited by 64
  11. 2016Discrete Distribution Estimation under Local Privacycited by 59
  12. 2019HybridAlpha: An Efficient Approach for Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 51
6 more
  1. 2023GIFD: A Generative Gradient Inversion Method with Feature Domain Optimizationcited by 45
  2. 2019QUOTIENT: Two-Party Secure Neural Network Training and Predictioncited by 41
  3. 2020An Accuracy-Lossless Perturbation Method for Defending Privacy Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 19
  4. 2021Gradient Leakage Attack Resilient Deep Learningcited by 18
  5. 2022Membership Inference Attacks and Generalization: A Causal Perspectivecited by 17
  6. 2020PrivFL: Practical Privacy-preserving Federated Regressions on High-dimensional Data over Mobile Networkscited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.