mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adaptive Reward Design for Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2412.10917 ↗First posted 14 Dec 2024cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 6

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Interpretable and logic-guided RL

Abstract (arXiv)

There is a surge of interest in using formal languages such as Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) to precisely and succinctly specify complex tasks and derive reward functions for Reinforcement Learning (RL). However, existing methods often assign sparse rewards (e.g., giving a reward of 1 only if a task is completed and 0 otherwise). By providing feedback solely upon task completion, these methods fail to encourage successful subtask completion. This is particularly problematic in environments with inherent uncertainty, where task completion may be unreliable despite progress on intermediate goals. To address this limitation, we propose a suite of reward functions that incentivize an RL agent to complete a task specified by an LTL formula as much as possible, and develop an adaptive reward shaping approach that dynamically updates reward functions during the learning process. Experimental results on a range of benchmark RL environments demonstrate that the proposed approach generally outperforms baselines, achieving earlier convergence to a better policy with higher expected return and task completion rate.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Interpretable and logic-guided RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 16 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2024.

Builds on

16 of 26 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  3. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
  4. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  5. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
  6. 2020Reward Machines: Exploiting Reward Function Structure in Reinforcement Learningcited by 191
  7. 2016Reinforcement Learning With Temporal Logic Rewardscited by 117
  8. 2019Reinforcement Learning for Temporal Logic Control Synthesis with Probabilistic Satisfaction Guaranteescited by 77
  9. 2019Control Synthesis from Linear Temporal Logic Specifications using Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 75
  10. 2018Foundations for Restraining Bolts: Reinforcement Learning with LTLf/LDLf restraining specificationscited by 72
  11. 2020A Composable Specification Language for Reinforcement Learning Taskscited by 69
  12. 2019From Language to Goals: Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Instruction Followingcited by 67
4 more
  1. 2021Compositional Reinforcement Learning from Logical Specificationscited by 67
  2. 2020Temporal-Logic-Based Reward Shaping for Continuing Reinforcement Learning Taskscited by 28
  3. 2022Overcoming Exploration: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control in Cluttered Environments from Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 12
  4. 2022Learning Minimally-Violating Continuous Control for Infeasible Linear Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Dense Dynamics-Aware Reward Synthesis: Integrating Prior Experience with Demonstrations
  2. 2025Reward Design for Reinforcement Learning Agents
  3. 2024On the Limitations of Markovian Rewards to Express Multi-Objective, Risk-Sensitive, and Modal Tasks
  4. 2024Logical Specifications-guided Dynamic Task Sampling for Reinforcement Learning Agents
  5. 2024To the Max: Reinventing Reward in Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2025Logic-based Task Representation and Reward Shaping in Multiagent Reinforcement Learning ↗
  7. 2024Directed Exploration in Reinforcement Learning from Linear Temporal Logic
  8. 2024Extracting Heuristics from Large Language Models for Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learning