Logical Specifications-guided Dynamic Task Sampling for Reinforcement Learning Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has made significant strides in enabling artificial agents to learn diverse behaviors. However, learning an effective policy often requires a large number of environment interactions. To mitigate sample complexity issues, recent approaches have used high-level task specifications, such as Linear Temporal Logic (LTLf) formulas or Reward Machines (RM), to guide the learning progress of the agent. In this work, we propose a novel approach, called Logical Specifications-guided Dynamic Task Sampling (LSTS), that learns a set of RL policies to guide an agent from an initial state to a goal state based on a high-level task specification, while minimizing the number of environmental interactions. Unlike previous work, LSTS does not assume information about the environment dynamics or the Reward Machine, and dynamically samples promising tasks that lead to successful goal policies. We evaluate LSTS on a gridworld and show that it achieves improved time-to-threshold performance on complex sequential decision-making problems compared to state-of-the-art RM and Automaton-guided RL baselines, such as Q-Learning for Reward Machines and Compositional RL from logical Specifications (DIRL). Moreover, we demonstrate that our method outperforms RM and Automaton-guided RL baselines in terms of sample-efficiency, both in a partially observable robotic task and in a continuous control robotic manipulation task.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2024.
Builds on
14 of 39 references.
References · 14
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2020Curriculum Learning for Reinforcement Learning Domains: A Framework and Surveycited by 350
- 2017Teacher-Student Curriculum Learningcited by 197
- 2020Reward Machines: Exploiting Reward Function Structure in Reinforcement Learningcited by 183
- 2019Control Synthesis from Linear Temporal Logic Specifications using Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 74
- 2020A Composable Specification Language for Reinforcement Learning Taskscited by 68
- 2021Compositional Reinforcement Learning from Logical Specificationscited by 65
- 2021panda-gym: Open-source goal-conditioned environments for robotic learningcited by 56
- 2020Reward Machines for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
- 2019Transfer of Temporal Logic Formulas in Reinforcement Learningcited by 31
- 2021Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 27
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.