mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

EvalGIM: A Library for Evaluating Generative Image Models

arXiv 2412.10604 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2024cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As the use of text-to-image generative models increases, so does the adoption of automatic benchmarking methods used in their evaluation. However, while metrics and datasets abound, there are few unified benchmarking libraries that provide a framework for performing evaluations across many datasets and metrics. Furthermore, the rapid introduction of increasingly robust benchmarking methods requires that evaluation libraries remain flexible to new datasets and metrics. Finally, there remains a gap in synthesizing evaluations in order to deliver actionable takeaways about model performance. To enable unified, flexible, and actionable evaluations, we introduce EvalGIM (pronounced ''EvalGym''), a library for evaluating generative image models. EvalGIM contains broad support for datasets and metrics used to measure quality, diversity, and consistency of text-to-image generative models. In addition, EvalGIM is designed with flexibility for user customization as a top priority and contains a structure that allows plug-and-play additions of new datasets and metrics. To enable actionable evaluation insights, we introduce ''Evaluation Exercises'' that highlight takeaways for specific evaluation questions. The Evaluation Exercises contain easy-to-use and reproducible implementations of two state-of-the-art evaluation methods of text-to-image generative models: consistency-diversity-realism Pareto Fronts and disaggregated measurements of performance disparities across groups. EvalGIM also contains Evaluation Exercises that introduce two new analysis methods for text-to-image generative models: robustness analyses of model rankings and balanced evaluations across different prompt styles. We encourage text-to-image model exploration with EvalGIM and invite contributions at https://github.com/facebookresearch/EvalGIM/.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2024.

Builds on

34 of 60 references.

References · 34

  1. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
  2. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  4. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,356
  5. 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
  6. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
  7. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,626
  8. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  9. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  10. 2022Scaling Autoregressive Models for Content-Rich Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,295
  11. 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 995
  12. 2024PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfercited by 696
22 more
  1. 2024Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generationcited by 474
  2. 2023Florence-2: Advancing a Unified Representation for a Variety of Vision Taskscited by 410
  3. 2023T2I-CompBench++: An Enhanced and Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-image Generationcited by 260
  4. 2017GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Local Nash Equilibriumcited by 213
  5. 2023VIEScore: Towards Explainable Metrics for Conditional Image Synthesis Evaluationcited by 201
  6. 2023Davidsonian Scene Graph: Improving Reliability in Fine-grained Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 171
  7. 2023Holistic Evaluation of Text-To-Image Modelscited by 160
  8. 2019Does Object Recognition Work for Everyone?cited by 151
  9. 2024GenAI-Bench: Evaluating and Improving Compositional Text-to-Visual Generationcited by 135
  10. 2021Evaluating CLIP: Towards Characterization of Broader Capabilities and Downstream Implicationscited by 128
  11. 2024GenAI Arena: An Open Evaluation Platform for Generative Modelscited by 82
  12. 2024ConceptMix: A Compositional Image Generation Benchmark with Controllable Difficultycited by 61
  13. 2024Commonsense-T2I Challenge: Can Text-to-Image Generation Models Understand Commonsense?cited by 52
  14. 2022DALLE-2 is Seeing Double: Flaws in Word-to-Concept Mapping in Text2Image Modelscited by 51
  15. 2023GeoDE: a Geographically Diverse Evaluation Dataset for Object Recognitioncited by 50
  16. 2024Consistency-diversity-realism Pareto fronts of conditional image generative modelscited by 36
  17. 2024Who Evaluates the Evaluations? Objectively Scoring Text-to-Image Prompt Coherence Metrics with T2IScoreScore (TS2)cited by 18
  18. 2024K-Sort Arena: Efficient and Reliable Benchmarking for Generative Models via K-wise Human Preferencescited by 16
  19. 2023A Contrastive Compositional Benchmark for Text-to-Image Synthesis: A Study with Unified Text-to-Image Fidelity Metricscited by 12
  20. 2024On Improved Conditioning Mechanisms and Pre-training Strategies for Diffusion Modelscited by 12
  21. 2023DIG In: Evaluating Disparities in Image Generations with Indicators for Geographic Diversitycited by 9
  22. 2024Decomposed evaluations of geographic disparities in text-to-image modelscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

5 papers.