mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Decomposed evaluations of geographic disparities in text-to-image models

arXiv 2406.11988 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.CYcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work has identified substantial disparities in generated images of different geographic regions, including stereotypical depictions of everyday objects like houses and cars. However, existing measures for these disparities have been limited to either human evaluations, which are time-consuming and costly, or automatic metrics evaluating full images, which are unable to attribute these disparities to specific parts of the generated images. In this work, we introduce a new set of metrics, Decomposed Indicators of Disparities in Image Generation (Decomposed-DIG), that allows us to separately measure geographic disparities in the depiction of objects and backgrounds in generated images. Using Decomposed-DIG, we audit a widely used latent diffusion model and find that generated images depict objects with better realism than backgrounds and that backgrounds in generated images tend to contain larger regional disparities than objects. We use Decomposed-DIG to pinpoint specific examples of disparities, such as stereotypical background generation in Africa, struggling to generate modern vehicles in Africa, and unrealistically placing some objects in outdoor settings. Informed by our metric, we use a new prompting structure that enables a 52% worst-region improvement and a 20% average improvement in generated background diversity.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2024.

Builds on

12 of 14 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  3. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  5. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  6. 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 944
  7. 2020Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Modelscited by 434
  8. 2023StableRep: Synthetic Images from Text-to-Image Models Make Strong Visual Representation Learnerscited by 177
  9. 2022How well can Text-to-Image Generative Models understand Ethical Natural Language Interventions?cited by 92
  10. 2023Inspecting the Geographical Representativeness of Images from Text-to-Image Modelscited by 44
  11. 2024Towards Geographic Inclusion in the Evaluation of Text-to-Image Modelscited by 16
  12. 2024Controlled Training Data Generation with Diffusion Modelscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026GeoDiv: Framework For Measuring Geographical Diversity In Text-To-Image Models
  2. 2024Improving Geo-diversity of Generated Images with Contextualized Vendi Score Guidance
  3. 2025AI's Blind Spots: Geographic Knowledge and Diversity Deficit in Generated Urban Scenario
  4. 2025Hidden Bias in the Machine: Stereotypes in Text-to-Image Models
  5. 2023Exploring Social Bias in Downstream Applications of Text-to-Image Foundation Models
  6. 2024MIST: Mitigating Intersectional Bias with Disentangled Cross-Attention Editing in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  7. 2025Culture in Action: Evaluating Text-to-Image Models through Social Activities
  8. 2025Diffusion Models Through a Global Lens: Are They Culturally Inclusive?