mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Edge-Splitting MLP: Node Classification on Homophilic and Heterophilic Graphs without Message Passing

arXiv 2412.08310 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs) have demonstrated remarkable success in node classification on homophilic graphs. It has been shown that they do not solely rely on homophily but on neighborhood distributions of nodes, i.e., consistency of the neighborhood label distribution within the same class. MLP-based models do not use message passing, eg Graph-MLP incorporates the neighborhood in a separate loss function. These models are faster and more robust to edge noise. Graph-MLP maps adjacent nodes closer in the embedding space but is unaware of the neighborhood pattern of the labels, i.e., relies solely on homophily. Edge Splitting GNN (ES-GNN) is a model specialized for heterophilic graphs and splits the edges into task-relevant and task-irrelevant, respectively. To mitigate the limitations of Graph-MLP on heterophilic graphs, we propose ES-MLP that combines Graph-MLP with an edge-splitting mechanism from ES-GNN. It incorporates the edge splitting into the loss of Graph-MLP to learn two separate adjacency matrices based on relevant and irrelevant feature pairs. Our experiments on seven datasets with six baselines show that ES-MLP is on par with homophilic and heterophilic models on all datasets without using edges during inference. We show that ES-MLP is robust to multiple types of edge noise during inference and that its inference time is two to five times faster than that of commonly used MPNNs. The source code is available at https://github.com/MatthiasKohn/ES-MLP.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2024.

Builds on

22 of 26 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,477
  5. 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 1,007
  6. 2020Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 826
  7. 2020Adaptive Universal Generalized PageRank Graph Neural Networkcited by 595
  8. 2019MixHop: Higher-Order Graph Convolutional Architectures via Sparsified Neighborhood Mixingcited by 443
  9. 2023A critical look at the evaluation of GNNs under heterophily: Are we really making progress?cited by 343
  10. 2021Large Scale Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs: New Benchmarks and Strong Simple Methodscited by 311
  11. 2021Two Sides of the Same Coin: Heterophily and Oversmoothing in Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 182
  12. 2022Graph Neural Networks for Graphs with Heterophily: A Surveycited by 175
10 more
  1. 2022Revisiting Heterophily For Graph Neural Networkscited by 169
  2. 2023Edge Directionality Improves Learning on Heterophilic Graphscited by 90
  3. 2021GBK-GNN: Gated Bi-Kernel Graph Neural Networks for Modeling Both Homophily and Heterophilycited by 84
  4. 2021Graph-MLP: Node Classification without Message Passing in Graphcited by 73
  5. 2022Characterizing Graph Datasets for Node Classification: Homophily-Heterophily Dichotomy and Beyondcited by 60
  6. 2023Demystifying Structural Disparity in Graph Neural Networks: Can One Size Fit All?cited by 41
  7. 2022Graph Attention Retrospectivecited by 24
  8. 2021Label-Wise Graph Convolutional Network for Heterophilic Graphscited by 17
  9. 2022ES-GNN: Generalizing Graph Neural Networks Beyond Homophily with Edge Splittingcited by 13
  10. 2023On Performance Discrepancies Across Local Homophily Levels in Graph Neural Networkscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.