mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Graph-to-SFILES: Control structure prediction from process topologies using generative artificial intelligence

arXiv 2412.00508 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CEcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Control structure design is an important but tedious step in P&ID development. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) promises to reduce P&ID development time by supporting engineers. Previous research on generative AI in chemical process design mainly represented processes by sequences. However, graphs offer a promising alternative because of their permutation invariance. We propose the Graph-to-SFILES model, a generative AI method to predict control structures from flowsheet topologies. The Graph-to-SFILES model takes the flowsheet topology as a graph input and returns a control-extended flowsheet as a sequence in the SFILES 2.0 notation. We compare four different graph encoder architectures, one of them being a graph neural network (GNN) proposed in this work. The Graph-to-SFILES model achieves a top-5 accuracy of 73.2% when trained on 10,000 flowsheet topologies. In addition, the proposed GNN performs best among the encoder architectures. Compared to a purely sequence-based approach, the Graph-to-SFILES model improves the top-5 accuracy for a relatively small training dataset of 1,000 flowsheets from 0.9% to 28.4%. However, the sequence-based approach performs better on a large-scale dataset of 100,000 flowsheets. These results highlight the potential of graph-based AI models to accelerate P&ID development in small-data regimes but their effectiveness on industry relevant case studies still needs to be investigated.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2024.

Builds on

22 of 58 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  4. 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
  5. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 818
  6. 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 653
  7. 2020Masked Label Prediction: Unified Message Passing Model for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 500
  8. 2018GraphRNN: Generating Realistic Graphs with Deep Auto-regressive Modelscited by 406
  9. 2022Multimodal Learning with Transformers: A Surveycited by 399
  10. 2018MolGAN: An implicit generative model for small molecular graphscited by 392
  11. 2018Molecular Transformer - A Model for Uncertainty-Calibrated Chemical Reaction Predictioncited by 225
  12. 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
10 more
  1. 2021Permutation invariant graph-to-sequence model for template-free retrosynthesis and reaction predictioncited by 66
  2. 2018Graph-to-Sequence Learning using Gated Graph Neural Networkscited by 61
  3. 2018A Graph-to-Sequence Model for AMR-to-Text Generationcited by 56
  4. 2018Graph2Seq: Graph to Sequence Learning with Attention-based Neural Networkscited by 36
  5. 2022Toward automatic generation of control structures for process flow diagrams with large language modelscited by 12
  6. 2022Flowsheet synthesis through hierarchical reinforcement learning and graph neural networkscited by 10
  7. 2022SFILES 2.0: An extended text-based flowsheet representationcited by 10
  8. 2022Learning from flowsheets: A generative transformer model for autocompletion of flowsheetscited by 10
  9. 2023Deep reinforcement learning for process design: Review and perspectivecited by 9
  10. 2023Toward autocorrection of chemical process flowsheets using large language modelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

5 papers.