Graph-to-SFILES: Control structure prediction from process topologies using generative artificial intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Control structure design is an important but tedious step in P&ID development. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) promises to reduce P&ID development time by supporting engineers. Previous research on generative AI in chemical process design mainly represented processes by sequences. However, graphs offer a promising alternative because of their permutation invariance. We propose the Graph-to-SFILES model, a generative AI method to predict control structures from flowsheet topologies. The Graph-to-SFILES model takes the flowsheet topology as a graph input and returns a control-extended flowsheet as a sequence in the SFILES 2.0 notation. We compare four different graph encoder architectures, one of them being a graph neural network (GNN) proposed in this work. The Graph-to-SFILES model achieves a top-5 accuracy of 73.2% when trained on 10,000 flowsheet topologies. In addition, the proposed GNN performs best among the encoder architectures. Compared to a purely sequence-based approach, the Graph-to-SFILES model improves the top-5 accuracy for a relatively small training dataset of 1,000 flowsheets from 0.9% to 28.4%. However, the sequence-based approach performs better on a large-scale dataset of 100,000 flowsheets. These results highlight the potential of graph-based AI models to accelerate P&ID development in small-data regimes but their effectiveness on industry relevant case studies still needs to be investigated.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2024.
Builds on
22 of 58 references.
References · 22
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
- 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 818
- 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 653
- 2020Masked Label Prediction: Unified Message Passing Model for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 500
- 2018GraphRNN: Generating Realistic Graphs with Deep Auto-regressive Modelscited by 406
- 2022Multimodal Learning with Transformers: A Surveycited by 399
- 2018MolGAN: An implicit generative model for small molecular graphscited by 392
- 2018Molecular Transformer - A Model for Uncertainty-Calibrated Chemical Reaction Predictioncited by 225
- 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
10 more
- 2021Permutation invariant graph-to-sequence model for template-free retrosynthesis and reaction predictioncited by 66
- 2018Graph-to-Sequence Learning using Gated Graph Neural Networkscited by 61
- 2018A Graph-to-Sequence Model for AMR-to-Text Generationcited by 56
- 2018Graph2Seq: Graph to Sequence Learning with Attention-based Neural Networkscited by 36
- 2022Toward automatic generation of control structures for process flow diagrams with large language modelscited by 12
- 2022Flowsheet synthesis through hierarchical reinforcement learning and graph neural networkscited by 10
- 2022SFILES 2.0: An extended text-based flowsheet representationcited by 10
- 2022Learning from flowsheets: A generative transformer model for autocompletion of flowsheetscited by 10
- 2023Deep reinforcement learning for process design: Review and perspectivecited by 9
- 2023Toward autocorrection of chemical process flowsheets using large language modelscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Multi-agent systems for chemical engineering: A review and perspectivecited by 9
- 2025Federated Learning from Molecules to Processes: A Perspectivecited by 2
- 2026GraphRAG for Engineering Diagrams: ChatP&ID Enables LLM Interaction with P&IDscited by 1
- 2024FaultExplainer: Leveraging Large Language Models for Interpretable Fault Detection and Diagnosiscited by 0
- 2026LLMs in Process Diagram Engineering: From Optimal PFDs to Validated P&IDscited by 0
- 2026LLMs in Process Diagram Engineering: From Optimal PFDs to Validated P&IDs21 Jul 2026
- 2026GraphRAG for Engineering Diagrams: ChatP&ID Enables LLM Interaction with P&IDs23 Mar 2026
- 2025Multi-agent systems for chemical engineering: A review and perspective11 Aug 2025
- 2025Federated Learning from Molecules to Processes: A Perspective23 Jun 2025
- 2024FaultExplainer: Leveraging Large Language Models for Interpretable Fault Detection and Diagnosis19 Dec 2024