GraphRAG for Engineering Diagrams: ChatP&ID Enables LLM Interaction with P&IDs
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Knowledge-graph and structured-knowledge RAG
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and knowledge graphs offer new opportunities for interacting with engineering diagrams such as Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs). However, directly processing raw images or smart P&ID files with LLMs is often costly, inefficient, and prone to hallucinations. This work introduces ChatP&ID, an agentic framework that enables grounded and cost-effective natural-language interaction with P&IDs using Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG), a paradigm we refer to as GraphRAG for engineering diagrams. Smart P&IDs encoded in the DEXPI standard are transformed into structured knowledge graphs, which serve as the basis for graph-based retrieval and reasoning by LLM agents. This approach enables reliable querying of engineering diagrams while significantly reducing computational cost. Benchmarking across commercial LLM APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic) demonstrates that graph-based representations improve accuracy by 18% over raw image inputs and reduce token costs by 85% compared to directly ingesting smart P&ID files. While small open-source models still struggle to interpret knowledge graph formats and structured engineering data, integrating them with VectorRAG and PathRAG improves response accuracy by up to 40%. Notably, GPT-5-mini combined with ContextRAG achieves 91% accuracy at a cost of only 0.004 per task. The resulting ChatP&ID interface enables intuitive natural-language interaction with complex engineering diagrams and lays the groundwork for AI-assisted process engineering tasks such as Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP) and multi-agent analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge-graph and structured-knowledge RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 30 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2026.
Builds on
30 of 61 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Multi-Agent GraphRAG: A Text-to-Cypher Framework for Labeled Property Graphs11 Nov
- 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization24 Apr
Other references · 28
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2024JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judgescited by 294
- 2018A Survey on Deep Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 281
- 2023Using an LLM to Help With Code Understandingcited by 222
16 more
- 2025A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systemscited by 108
- 2024In Search of Needles in a 11M Haystack: Recurrent Memory Finds What LLMs Misscited by 36
- 2024GIVE: Structured Reasoning of Large Language Models with Knowledge Graph Inspired Veracity Extrapolationcited by 13
- 2024An Agentic Approach to Automatic Creation of P&ID Diagrams from Natural Language Descriptionscited by 12
- 2025OckBench: Measuring the Efficiency of LLM Reasoningcited by 10
- 2025Multi-agent systems for chemical engineering: A review and perspectivecited by 9
- 2025Deep Semantic Graph Learning via LLM based Node Enhancementcited by 8
- 2025SAGE: A Realistic Benchmark for Semantic Understandingcited by 6
- 2025The Massive Legal Embedding Benchmark (MLEB)cited by 6
- 2024Graph-to-SFILES: Control structure prediction from process topologies using generative artificial intelligencecited by 5
- 2025Talking like Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs)cited by 5
- 2026Do Chatbot LLMs Talk Too Much? The YapBench Benchmarkcited by 5
- 2023Empirical assessment of ChatGPT's answering capabilities in natural science and engineeringcited by 4
- 2025Engineering RAG Systems for Real-World Applications: Design, Development, and Evaluationcited by 3
- 2025SEA-BED: How Do Embedding Models Represent Southeast Asian Languages?cited by 2
- 2025Rule-based autocorrection of Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) on graphscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Integrating Graphs, Large Language Models, and Agents: Reasoning and Retrieval
- 2024LEGO-GraphRAG: Modularizing Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Design Space Exploration
- 2026Knowledge Graphs as the Missing Data Layer for LLM-Based Industrial Asset Operations
- 2026Beyond Vector Similarity: A Structural Analysis of Graph-Augmented Retrieval for Industrial Knowledge Graphs
- 2024Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey
- 2025A Survey of Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Customized Large Language Models
- 2025XGraphRAG: Interactive Visual Analysis for Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025When to use Graphs in RAG: A Comprehensive Analysis for Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation