Act Now: A Novel Online Forecasting Framework for Large-Scale Streaming Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we find that existing online forecasting methods have the following issues: 1) They do not consider the update frequency of streaming data and directly use labels (future signals) to update the model, leading to information leakage. 2) Eliminating information leakage can exacerbate concept drift and online parameter updates can damage prediction accuracy. 3) Leaving out a validation set cuts off the model's continued learning. 4) Existing GPU devices cannot support online learning of large-scale streaming data. To address the above issues, we propose a novel online learning framework, Act-Now, to improve the online prediction on large-scale streaming data. Firstly, we introduce a Random Subgraph Sampling (RSS) algorithm designed to enable efficient model training. Then, we design a Fast Stream Buffer (FSB) and a Slow Stream Buffer (SSB) to update the model online. FSB updates the model immediately with the consistent pseudo- and partial labels to avoid information leakage. SSB updates the model in parallel using complete labels from earlier times. Further, to address concept drift, we propose a Label Decomposition model (Lade) with statistical and normalization flows. Lade forecasts both the statistical variations and the normalized future values of the data, integrating them through a combiner to produce the final predictions. Finally, we propose to perform online updates on the validation set to ensure the consistency of model learning on streaming data. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed Act-Now framework performs well on large-scale streaming data, with an average 28.4% and 19.5% performance improvement, respectively. Experiments can be reproduced via https://github.com/Anoise/Act-Now.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2024.
Builds on
27 of 52 references.
References · 27
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,169
- 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 2,039
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
- 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,676
- 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,424
- 2022FEDformer: Frequency Enhanced Decomposed Transformer for Long-term Series Forecastingcited by 1,210
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,095
- 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 911
- 2019N-BEATS: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecastingcited by 753
- 2018Learning to Learn without Forgetting by Maximizing Transfer and Minimizing Interferencecited by 521
- 2022Non-stationary Transformers: Exploring the Stationarity in Time Series Forecastingcited by 391
15 more
- 2019Online Continual Learning with Maximally Interfered Retrievalcited by 379
- 2023Frequency-domain MLPs are More Effective Learners in Time Series Forecastingcited by 172
- 2019Think Globally, Act Locally: A Deep Neural Network Approach to High-Dimensional Time Series Forecastingcited by 161
- 2022CoST: Contrastive Learning of Disentangled Seasonal-Trend Representations for Time Series Forecastingcited by 144
- 2023FourierGNN: Rethinking Multivariate Time Series Forecasting from a Pure Graph Perspectivecited by 127
- 2022Learning Fast, Learning Slow: A General Continual Learning Method based on Complementary Learning Systemcited by 112
- 2017Online Deep Learning: Learning Deep Neural Networks on the Flycited by 86
- 2023OneNet: Enhancing Time Series Forecasting Models under Concept Drift by Online Ensemblingcited by 74
- 2022Learning Fast and Slow for Online Time Series Forecastingcited by 45
- 2022DDG-DA: Data Distribution Generation for Predictable Concept Drift Adaptationcited by 36
- 2013Online Learning for Time Series Predictioncited by 33
- 2022Generalizing to Evolving Domains with Latent Structure-Aware Sequential Autoencodercited by 19
- 2019Dynamic Local Regret for Non-convex Online Forecastingcited by 17
- 2017Online Forecasting Matrix Factorizationcited by 7
- 2023Does Long-Term Series Forecasting Need Complex Attention and Extra Long Inputs?cited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2026The Forecast After the Forecast: A Post-Processing Shift in Time Seriescited by 10
- 2026Towards Principled Test-Time Adaptation for Time Series Forecastingcited by 5
- 2025DeepBooTS: Dual-Stream Residual Boosting for Drift-Resilient Time-Series Forecastingcited by 1
- 2026When Does Online Adaptation Pay on the Edge? A Leakage-Free Evaluation of Warmup, Learning-Rate Selection, and Resource Trade-offs for Time-Series Forecastingcited by 0
- 2026Downside-Controlled Online Forecast Combination under Delayed and Revised Outcomescited by 0
- 2026Training on the Future: A Delay-Aware Audit of Test-Time Adaptation for Time-Series Forecastingcited by 0
- 2026Training on the Future: A Delay-Aware Audit of Test-Time Adaptation for Time-Series Forecasting8 Oct 2026
- 2026Downside-Controlled Online Forecast Combination under Delayed and Revised Outcomes24 Sep 2026
- 2026When Does Online Adaptation Pay on the Edge? A Leakage-Free Evaluation of Warmup, Learning-Rate Selection, and Resource Trade-offs for Time-Series Forecasting1 Sep 2026
- 2026Towards Principled Test-Time Adaptation for Time Series Forecasting17 May 2026
- 2026The Forecast After the Forecast: A Post-Processing Shift in Time Series28 Jan 2026
- 2025DeepBooTS: Dual-Stream Residual Boosting for Drift-Resilient Time-Series Forecasting10 Nov 2025