mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multiplicity is an Inevitable and Inherent Challenge in Multimodal Learning

arXiv 2505.19614 ↗First posted 26 May 2025cs.LG cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal learning has seen remarkable progress, particularly with large-scale pre-training across various modalities. Most current approaches are built on the assumption of a deterministic one-to-one alignment between modalities. However, this oversimplifies real-world multimodal relationships, where their nature is inherently many-to-many. The many-to-many property, or multiplicity, is not a side-effect of noise or annotation error, but an inevitable outcome of intra-modal variability, representational asymmetry, and task-dependent ambiguity in multimodal tasks. We argue that multiplicity is a fundamental bottleneck that affects all stages of the multimodal learning pipeline: from data construction to model training and evaluation benchmarks. By formalizing its causes and consequences, we demonstrate how ignoring multiplicity leads to training uncertainty, unreliable evaluation, and degraded dataset quality. This position paper calls for new research directions on multimodal learning, including multiplicity-aware learning frameworks and dataset construction and evaluation protocols.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 78 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.

Builds on

78 of 99 references.

References · 78

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  6. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  7. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  8. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  9. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  10. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  11. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  12. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
38 more
  1. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,887
  2. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  3. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  4. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,222
  5. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
  6. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
  7. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
  8. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,230
  9. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,216
  10. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
  11. 2024DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 867
  12. 2017VoxCeleb: a large-scale speaker identification datasetcited by 732
  13. 2020VGGSound: A Large-scale Audio-Visual Datasetcited by 648
  14. 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 644
  15. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  16. 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 561
  17. 2021Supervision Exists Everywhere: A Data Efficient Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training Paradigmcited by 405
  18. 2020Are we done with ImageNet?cited by 333
  19. 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 321
  20. 2024Long-CLIP: Unlocking the Long-Text Capability of CLIPcited by 300
  21. 2023Data Filtering Networkscited by 250
  22. 2019Connecting Vision and Language with Localized Narrativescited by 226
  23. 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 219
  24. 2022CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?cited by 181
  25. 2021RedCaps: web-curated image-text data created by the people, for the peoplecited by 180
  26. 2023ViP-LLaVA: Making Large Multimodal Models Understand Arbitrary Visual Promptscited by 161
  27. 2023Holistic Evaluation of Text-To-Image Modelscited by 160
  28. 2021Probabilistic Embeddings for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 151
  29. 2020Learning the Best Pooling Strategy for Visual Semantic Embeddingcited by 137
  30. 2015Visually Indicated Soundscited by 128
  31. 2020Boosting Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning with False Negative Cancellationcited by 119
  32. 2021Re-labeling ImageNet: from Single to Multi-Labels, from Global to Localized Labelscited by 118
  33. 2019Large-scale interactive object segmentation with human annotatorscited by 110
  34. 2022Text-Only Training for Image Captioning using Noise-Injected CLIPcited by 91
  35. 2024What If We Recaption Billions of Web Images with LLaMA-3?cited by 87
  36. 2023CompoDiff: Versatile Composed Image Retrieval With Latent Diffusioncited by 85
  37. 2023DeCap: Decoding CLIP Latents for Zero-Shot Captioning via Text-Only Trainingcited by 84
  38. 2019Polysemous Visual-Semantic Embedding for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 83

50 most cited of 78 All 78 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.