mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Symbolic Regression and Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Dimensional Analysis

arXiv 2411.15919 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2024cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In engineering and applied mathematics, developing accurate mathematical models to predict and understand real-world phenomena is of utmost importance. Symbolic regression is a useful machine learning-based tool to fit models but it can be computationally expensive. We present a new method for enhancing symbolic regression for differential equations via dimensional analysis, specifically the Buckingham Pi theorem and Ipsen's method. Since symbolic regression often suffers from high computational costs and overfitting, nondimensionalizing datasets reduces the number of input variables, simplifies the search space, and ensures that derived equations are physically meaningful. As a first step, we combine dimensional analysis with the PySR symbolic regression algorithm to show that dimensional analysis improves the accuracy of recovering algebraic equations. The results demonstrate that transforming data into a dimensionless form significantly improves the training and test error of the symbolic expressions found. Then, as our main contribution, we perform nondimensionalization guided by Ipsen's method. We then incorporate the nondimensionalized equation into a pipeline combining Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks and symbolic regression to recover the unknown term when a differential equation is only partially known. We find that symbolic regression is able to better recover the unknown term after nondimensionalizing the data, under both noisy and noiseless conditions. These findings suggest that integrating dimensional analysis with symbolic regression can significantly lower computational costs and increase accuracy, providing a robust framework for automated discovery of governing equations in complex systems when data is limited.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2024.

Builds on

14 of 42 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  3. 2020Universal Differential Equations for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 345
  4. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  5. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 195
  6. 2020Integrating Scientific Knowledge with Machine Learning for Engineering and Environmental Systemscited by 160
  7. 2021SymbolicGPT: A Generative Transformer Model for Symbolic Regressioncited by 101
  8. 2020On Interpretability of Artificial Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 88
  9. 2022Symbolic Regression is NP-hardcited by 68
  10. 2022Symbolic Physics Learner: Discovering governing equations via Monte Carlo tree searchcited by 61
  11. 2023Deep symbolic regression for physics guided by units constraints: toward the automated discovery of physical lawscited by 55
  12. 2022A computational framework for physics-informed symbolic regression with straightforward integration of domain knowledgecited by 31
2 more
  1. 2022Dimensionally Consistent Learning with Buckingham Picited by 20
  2. 2023A Neural-Guided Dynamic Symbolic Network for Exploring Mathematical Expressions from Datacited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.