mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Decompose and Leverage Preferences from Expert Models for Improving Trustworthiness of MLLMs

arXiv 2411.13697 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2024cs.CVcited by 2

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning

Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can enhance trustworthiness by aligning with human preferences. As human preference labeling is laborious, recent works employ evaluation models for assessing MLLMs' responses, using the model-based assessments to automate preference dataset construction. This approach, however, faces challenges with MLLMs' lengthy and compositional responses, which often require diverse reasoning skills that a single evaluation model may not fully possess. Additionally, most existing methods rely on closed-source models as evaluators. To address limitations, we propose DecompGen, a decomposable framework that uses an ensemble of open-sourced expert models. DecompGen breaks down each response into atomic verification tasks, assigning each task to an appropriate expert model to generate fine-grained assessments. The DecompGen feedback is used to automatically construct our preference dataset, DGPref. MLLMs aligned with DGPref via preference learning show improvements in trustworthiness, demonstrating the effectiveness of DecompGen.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Sampling Preferences Yields Simple Trustworthiness Scores
  2. 2024More RLHF, More Trust? On The Impact of Preference Alignment On Trustworthiness
  3. 2026Automated Concept Discovery for LLM-as-a-Judge Preference Analysis
  4. 2025Rethinking Human Preference Evaluation of LLM Rationales
  5. 2024Compare without Despair: Reliable Preference Evaluation with Generation Separability
  6. 2025OrdMoE: Preference Alignment via Hierarchical Expert Group Ranking in Multimodal Mixture-of-Experts LLMs
  7. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts
  8. 2023Compositional preference models for aligning LMs