STAMP: Symmetric Temporal Averaging Message Passing for Domain Adaptation in Chronologically Split Graphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper addresses domain adaptation in graph-structured data under chronological splits. We consider transductive semi-supervised node classification (SSNC), in which labels of historical nodes are used to predict labels of more recent nodes. Temporal dependencies in graph connectivity induce distribution shifts across time, often degrading the performance of models trained on past nodes. Despite its practical relevance, domain adaptation under chronological graph splits remains relatively underexplored. We propose Symmetric Temporal Averaging Message Passing (STAMP), a timestamp-balanced operator that replaces standard neighborhood aggregation with temporally aligned propagation. We call its specialized variant for the heterogeneous ogbn-mag dataset STAMP-mag, reserving STAMP for the general formulation. By balancing messages across timestamps, STAMP enforces first-moment invariance across temporal domains while remaining scalable and easy to implement. Unlike many existing domain adaptation methods, whose assumptions are difficult to verify on graphs, STAMP relies on transparent, practically checkable conditions and is supported by theoretical analysis. Empirically, STAMP and STAMP-mag improve accuracy across all evaluated temporal graph benchmarks. STAMP achieves state-of-the-art performance on ogbn-arxiv, while STAMP-mag does so on ogbn-mag. For temporal-split Pokec, where no established benchmark exists, applying STAMP to the state-of-the-art model for the original dataset consistently improves performance under our chronological split. These results demonstrate that timestamp-balanced propagation is an effective and practical approach to mitigating temporal distribution shift in graph learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2024.
Builds on
22 of 34 references.
References · 22
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
- 2018Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 1,138
- 2017MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learningcited by 1,051
- 2018Hypergraph Neural Networkscited by 488
- 2019EvolveGCN: Evolving Graph Convolutional Networks for Dynamic Graphscited by 447
- 2020SIGN: Scalable Inception Graph Neural Networkscited by 284
- 2019Sliced Wasserstein Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 235
- 2021Training Graph Neural Networks with 1000 Layerscited by 169
- 2022Handling Distribution Shifts on Graphs: An Invariance Perspectivecited by 164
10 more
- 2021Node Feature Extraction by Self-Supervised Multi-scale Neighborhood Predictioncited by 138
- 2018Contextual Stochastic Block Modelscited by 134
- 2016Theoretical Analysis of Domain Adaptation with Optimal Transportcited by 105
- 2022Graph Attention Multi-Layer Perceptroncited by 83
- 2022Simple and Efficient Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networkcited by 71
- 2022ClusterGNN: Cluster-based Coarse-to-Fine Graph Neural Network for Efficient Feature Matchingcited by 62
- 2015A New PAC-Bayesian Perspective on Domain Adaptationcited by 29
- 2023Efficient Heterogeneous Graph Learning via Random Projectioncited by 16
- 2024Loss-aware Curriculum Learning for Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2024Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks with Loss-decrease-aware Curriculum Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.