Private Counterfactual Retrieval With Immutable Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In a classification task, counterfactual explanations provide the minimum change needed for an input to be classified into a favorable class. We consider the problem of privately retrieving the exact closest counterfactual from a database of accepted samples while enforcing that certain features of the input sample cannot be changed, i.e., they are immutable. An applicant (user) whose feature vector is rejected by a machine learning model wants to retrieve the sample closest to them in the database without altering a private subset of their features, which constitutes the immutable set. While doing this, the user should keep their feature vector, immutable set and the resulting counterfactual index information-theoretically private from the institution. We refer to this as immutable private counterfactual retrieval (I-PCR) problem which generalizes PCR to a more practical setting. In this paper, we propose two I-PCR schemes by leveraging techniques from private information retrieval (PIR) and characterize their communication costs. Further, we quantify the information that the user learns about the database and compare it for the proposed schemes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2024.
Builds on
29 of 44 references.
References · 29
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
- 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 233
- 2021Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic Recoursecited by 102
- 2021NICE: An Algorithm for Nearest Instance Counterfactual Explanationscited by 62
- 2022Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Tree-Based Ensemblescited by 49
- 2023Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networks With Probabilistic Guaranteescited by 45
- 2021A Survey on the Robustness of Feature Importance and Counterfactual Explanationscited by 39
- 2022DualCF: Efficient Model Extraction Attack from Counterfactual Explanationscited by 32
- 2022On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Recoursecited by 32
- 2022The privacy issue of counterfactual explanations: explanation linkage attackscited by 20
- 2024Model Reconstruction Using Counterfactual Explanations: A Perspective From Polytope Theorycited by 14
17 more
- 2022Differentially Private Counterfactuals via Functional Mechanismcited by 13
- 2021Private Retrieval, Computing and Learning: Recent Progress and Future Challengescited by 12
- 2016The Capacity of Private Information Retrievalcited by 6
- 2016The Capacity of Robust Private Information Retrieval with Colluding Databasescited by 6
- 2016The Capacity of Private Information Retrieval from Coded Databasescited by 6
- 2016The Capacity of Symmetric Private Information Retrievalcited by 5
- 2017Multi-Message Private Information Retrieval: Capacity Results and Near-Optimal Schemescited by 5
- 2023Privacy-Preserving Algorithmic Recoursecited by 5
- 2018Capacity-Achieving Private Information Retrieval Codes with Optimal Message Size and Upload Costcited by 4
- 2020Semantic Private Information Retrievalcited by 4
- 2017The Capacity of Private Information Retrieval from Byzantine and Colluding Databasescited by 3
- 2017Fundamental Limits of Cache-Aided Private Information Retrieval with Unknown and Uncoded Prefetchingcited by 2
- 2018Private Information Retrieval Through Wiretap Channel II: Privacy Meets Securitycited by 2
- 2018The Capacity of Private Information Retrieval with Eavesdropperscited by 2
- 2018The Capacity of Private Information Retrieval from Uncoded Storage Constrained Databasescited by 2
- 2019The Capacity of Private Information Retrieval from Heterogeneous Uncoded Caching Databasescited by 2
- 2024Private Counterfactual Retrievalcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.