mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Toward Cultural Interpretability: A Linguistic Anthropological Framework for Describing and Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs)

arXiv 2411.05200 ↗First posted 7 Nov 2024cs.CY cs.CL cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This article proposes a new integration of linguistic anthropology and machine learning (ML) around convergent interests in both the underpinnings of language and making language technologies more socially responsible. While linguistic anthropology focuses on interpreting the cultural basis for human language use, the ML field of interpretability is concerned with uncovering the patterns that Large Language Models (LLMs) learn from human verbal behavior. Through the analysis of a conversation between a human user and an LLM-powered chatbot, we demonstrate the theoretical feasibility of a new, conjoint field of inquiry, cultural interpretability (CI). By focusing attention on the communicative competence involved in the way human users and AI chatbots co-produce meaning in the articulatory interface of human-computer interaction, CI emphasizes how the dynamic relationship between language and culture makes contextually sensitive, open-ended conversation possible. We suggest that, by examining how LLMs internally "represent" relationships between language and culture, CI can: (1) provide insight into long-standing linguistic anthropological questions about the patterning of those relationships; and (2) aid model developers and interface designers in improving value alignment between language models and stylistically diverse speakers and culturally diverse speech communities. Our discussion proposes three critical research axes: relativity, variation, and indexicality.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2024.

Builds on

18 of 86 references.

References · 18

  1. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  2. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
  3. 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 333
  4. 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metricscited by 239
  5. 2024Towards Measuring and Modeling "Culture" in LLMs: A Surveycited by 167
  6. 2022Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Textcited by 155
  7. 2024Investigating Cultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 143
  8. 2020How Can We Accelerate Progress Towards Human-like Linguistic Generalization?cited by 114
  9. 2023VisText: A Benchmark for Semantically Rich Chart Captioningcited by 112
  10. 2023Cultural Alignment in Large Language Models: An Explanatory Analysis Based on Hofstede's Cultural Dimensionscited by 112
  11. 2024Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 111
  12. 2020Low-resource Languages: A Review of Past Work and Future Challengescited by 91
6 more
  1. 2024CultureLLM: Incorporating Cultural Differences into Large Language Modelscited by 50
  2. 2024AI Hallucinations: A Misnomer Worth Clarifyingcited by 34
  3. 2024Exploring Multilingual Concepts of Human Value in Large Language Models: Is Value Alignment Consistent, Transferable and Controllable across Languages?cited by 24
  4. 2022How do you Converse with an Analytical Chatbot? Revisiting Gricean Maxims for Designing Analytical Conversational Behaviorcited by 20
  5. 2024The Call for Socially Aware Language Technologiescited by 13
  6. 2023Learning Human-like Representations to Enable Learning Human Valuescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.