mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing literature review with LLM and NLP methods. Algorithmic trading case

arXiv 2411.05013 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2024q-fin.ST cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study utilizes machine learning algorithms to analyze and organize knowledge in the field of algorithmic trading. By filtering a dataset of 136 million research papers, we identified 14,342 relevant articles published between 1956 and Q1 2020. We compare traditional practices-such as keyword-based algorithms and embedding techniques-with state-of-the-art topic modeling methods that employ dimensionality reduction and clustering. This comparison allows us to assess the popularity and evolution of different approaches and themes within algorithmic trading. We demonstrate the usefulness of Natural Language Processing (NLP) in the automatic extraction of knowledge, highlighting the new possibilities created by the latest iterations of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. The rationale for focusing on this topic stems from our analysis, which reveals that research articles on algorithmic trading are increasing at a faster rate than the overall number of publications. While stocks and main indices comprise more than half of all assets considered, certain asset classes, such as cryptocurrencies, exhibit a much stronger growth trend. Machine learning models have become the most popular methods in recent years. The study demonstrates the efficacy of LLMs in refining datasets and addressing intricate questions about the analyzed articles, such as comparing the efficiency of different models. Our research shows that by decomposing tasks into smaller components and incorporating reasoning steps, we can effectively tackle complex questions supported by case analyses. This approach contributes to a deeper understanding of algorithmic trading methodologies and underscores the potential of advanced NLP techniques in literature reviews.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2024.

Builds on

11 of 26 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,414
  4. 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 779
  5. 2023HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 329
  6. 2020TLDR: Extreme Summarization of Scientific Documentscited by 136
  7. 2018Tunability: Importance of Hyperparameters of Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 98
  8. 2020Rethinking the Hyperparameters for Fine-tuningcited by 69
  9. 2018Over-Optimization of Academic Publishing Metrics: Observing Goodhart's Law in Actioncited by 22
  10. 2022The Diminishing Returns of Masked Language Models to Sciencecited by 22
  11. 2023ChatLog: Carefully Evaluating the Evolution of ChatGPT Across Timecited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024TradExpert: Revolutionizing Trading with Mixture of Expert LLMs
  2. 2024Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey
  3. 2026Automated Summarization of Financial News Using Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation: An Early Empirical Study (Fall 2023)
  4. 2025MetaGraph: A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of GenAI in Financial NLP (2022-2025)
  5. 2024FinBen: A Holistic Financial Benchmark for Large Language Models
  6. 2026CN-Buzz2Portfolio: A Chinese-Market Dataset and Benchmark for LLM-Based Macro and Sector Asset Allocation from Daily Trending Financial News
  7. 2026QuantCode-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating the Ability of Large Language Models to Generate Executable Algorithmic Trading Strategies
  8. 2025Agent Trading Arena: A Study on Numerical Understanding in LLM-Based Agents