mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DISCO: DISCovering Overfittings as Causal Rules for Text Classification Models

arXiv 2411.04649 ↗First posted 7 Nov 2024cs.AI cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid advancement of neural language models, the deployment of over-parameterized models has surged, increasing the need for interpretable explanations comprehensible to human inspectors. Existing post-hoc interpretability methods, which often focus on unigram features of single input textual instances, fail to capture the models' decision-making process fully. Additionally, many methods do not differentiate between decisions based on spurious correlations and those based on a holistic understanding of the input. Our paper introduces DISCO, a novel method for discovering global, rule-based explanations by identifying causal n-gram associations with model predictions. This method employs a scalable sequence mining technique to extract relevant text spans from training data, associate them with model predictions, and conduct causality checks to distill robust rules that elucidate model behavior. These rules expose potential overfitting and provide insights into misleading feature combinations. We validate DISCO through extensive testing, demonstrating its superiority over existing methods in offering comprehensive insights into complex model behaviors. Our approach successfully identifies all shortcuts manually introduced into the training data (100% detection rate on the MultiRC dataset), resulting in an 18.8% regression in model performance -- a capability unmatched by any other method. Furthermore, DISCO supports interactive explanations, enabling human inspectors to distinguish spurious causes in the rule-based output. This alleviates the burden of abundant instance-wise explanations and helps assess the model's risk when encountering out-of-distribution (OOD) data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2024.

Builds on

23 of 38 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  4. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  5. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
  6. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 439
  7. 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
  8. 2020Compositional Explanations of Neuronscited by 172
  9. 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 156
  10. 2020Invariant Rationalizationcited by 131
  11. 2020Interpretable Machine Learning -- A Brief History, State-of-the-Art and Challengescited by 120
  12. 2021Identifying and Mitigating Spurious Correlations for Improving Robustness in NLP Modelscited by 76
11 more
  1. 2021"Will You Find These Shortcuts?" A Protocol for Evaluating the Faithfulness of Input Salience Methods for Text Classificationcited by 66
  2. 2019Inferring Which Medical Treatments Work from Reports of Clinical Trialscited by 64
  3. 2020Identifying Spurious Correlations for Robust Text Classificationcited by 59
  4. 2021Explain and Predict, and then Predict Againcited by 29
  5. 2021Simplified Data Wrangling with ir_datasetscited by 27
  6. 2022A Rationale-Centric Framework for Human-in-the-loop Machine Learningcited by 27
  7. 2022Explainable Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 15
  8. 2022The Change that Matters in Discourse Parsing: Estimating the Impact of Domain Shift on Parser Errorcited by 12
  9. 2021Towards Benchmarking the Utility of Explanations for Model Debuggingcited by 10
  10. 2020Interpreting Deep Learning Model Using Rule-based Methodcited by 1
  11. 2022SparCAssist: A Model Risk Assessment Assistant Based on Sparse Generated Counterfactualscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.