Predicting the Temperature-Dependent CMC of Surfactant Mixtures with Graph Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Surfactants are key ingredients in foaming and cleansing products across various industries such as personal and home care, industrial cleaning, and more, with the critical micelle concentration (CMC) being of major interest. Predictive models for CMC of pure surfactants have been developed based on recent ML methods, however, in practice surfactant mixtures are typically used due to to performance, environmental, and cost reasons. This requires accounting for synergistic/antagonistic interactions between surfactants; however, predictive ML models for a wide spectrum of mixtures are missing so far. Herein, we develop a graph neural network (GNN) framework for surfactant mixtures to predict the temperature-dependent CMC. We collect data for 108 surfactant binary mixtures, to which we add data for pure species from our previous work [Brozos et al. (2024), J. Chem. Theory Comput.]. We then develop and train GNNs and evaluate their accuracy across different prediction test scenarios for binary mixtures relevant to practical applications. The final GNN models demonstrate very high predictive performance when interpolating between different mixture compositions and for new binary mixtures with known species. Extrapolation to binary surfactant mixtures where either one or both surfactant species are not seen before, yields accurate results for the majority of surfactant systems. We further find superior accuracy of the GNN over a semi-empirical model based on activity coefficients, which has been widely used to date. We then explore if GNN models trained solely on binary mixture and pure species data can also accurately predict the CMCs of ternary mixtures. Finally, we experimentally measure the CMC of 4 commercial surfactants that contain up to four species and industrial relevant mixtures and find a very good agreement between measured and predicted CMC values.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2024.
Builds on
18 of 87 references.
References · 18
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,576
- 2019Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networkscited by 971
- 2019Analyzing Learned Molecular Representations for Property Predictioncited by 375
- 2021Ensemble deep learning: A reviewcited by 284
- 2022Graph neural networks for materials science and chemistrycited by 182
- 2023Gibbs-Duhem-Informed Neural Networks for Binary Activity Coefficient Predictioncited by 17
- 2022Graph Neural Networks for Temperature-Dependent Activity Coefficient Prediction of Solutes in Ionic Liquidscited by 14
6 more
- 2022Graph neural networks for the prediction of molecular structure-property relationshipscited by 12
- 2022Gibbs-Helmholtz Graph Neural Network: capturing the temperature dependency of activity coefficients at infinite dilutioncited by 12
- 2024Thermodynamics-Consistent Graph Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2024Graph Neural Networks for Surfactant Multi-Property Predictioncited by 3
- 2023MolSets: Molecular Graph Deep Sets Learning for Mixture Property Modelingcited by 2
- 2024Predicting the Temperature Dependence of Surfactant CMCs Using Graph Neural Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.