mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hedging and Pricing Structured Products Featuring Multiple Underlying Assets

arXiv 2411.01121 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2024cs.CE cs.LG q-fin.PRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hedging a portfolio containing autocallable notes presents unique challenges due to the complex risk profile of these financial instruments. In addition to hedging, pricing these notes, particularly when multiple underlying assets are involved, adds another layer of complexity. Pricing autocallable notes involves intricate considerations of various risk factors, including underlying assets, interest rates, and volatility. Traditional pricing methods, such as sample-based Monte Carlo simulations, are often time-consuming and impractical for long maturities, particularly when there are multiple underlying assets. In this paper, we explore autocallable structured notes with three underlying assets and proposes a machine learning-based pricing method that significantly improves efficiency, computing prices 250 times faster than traditional Monte Carlo simulation based method. Additionally, we introduce a Distributional Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithm to hedge a portfolio containing an autocallable structured note. Our distributional RL based hedging strategy provides better PnL compared to traditional Delta-neutral and Delta-Gamma neutral hedging strategies. The VaR 5% (PnL value) of our RL agent based hedging is 33.95, significantly outperforming both the Delta neutral strategy, which has a VaR 5% of -0.04, and the Delta-Gamma neutral strategy, which has a VaR 5% of 13.05. It also provides the hedging action with better left tail PnL, such as 95% and 99% value-at-risk (VaR) and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR), highlighting its potential for front-office hedging and risk management.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2024.

Builds on

9 of 25 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  2. 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 464
  3. 2018Distributed Distributional Deterministic Policy Gradientscited by 195
  4. 2019Reinforcement Learning for Market Making in a Multi-agent Dealer Marketcited by 35
  5. 2017QLBS: Q-Learner in the Black-Scholes(-Merton) Worldscited by 23
  6. 2022Gamma and Vega Hedging Using Deep Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  7. 2021A deep learning approach to data-driven model-free pricing and to martingale optimal transportcited by 6
  8. 2023Towards Generalizable Reinforcement Learning for Trade Executioncited by 5
  9. 2022Offline Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Pricing of Consumer Creditcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.