mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Chasing Better Deep Image Priors between Over- and Under-parameterization

arXiv 2410.24187 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are well-known to act as over-parameterized deep image priors (DIP) that regularize various image inverse problems. Meanwhile, researchers also proposed extremely compact, under-parameterized image priors (e.g., deep decoder) that are strikingly competent for image restoration too, despite a loss of accuracy. These two extremes push us to think whether there exists a better solution in the middle: between over- and under-parameterized image priors, can one identify "intermediate" parameterized image priors that achieve better trade-offs between performance, efficiency, and even preserving strong transferability? Drawing inspirations from the lottery ticket hypothesis (LTH), we conjecture and study a novel "lottery image prior" (LIP) by exploiting DNN inherent sparsity, stated as: given an over-parameterized DNN-based image prior, it will contain a sparse subnetwork that can be trained in isolation, to match the original DNN's performance when being applied as a prior to various image inverse problems. Our results validate the superiority of LIPs: we can successfully locate the LIP subnetworks from over-parameterized DIPs at substantial sparsity ranges. Those LIP subnetworks significantly outperform deep decoders under comparably compact model sizes (by often fully preserving the effectiveness of their over-parameterized counterparts), and they also possess high transferability across different images as well as restoration task types. Besides, we also extend LIP to compressive sensing image reconstruction, where a pre-trained GAN generator is used as the prior (in contrast to untrained DIP or deep decoder), and confirm its validity in this setting too. To our best knowledge, this is the first time that LTH is demonstrated to be relevant in the context of inverse problems or image priors.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2024.

Builds on

62 of 86 references.

References · 62

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,988
  4. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  5. 2016Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 1,908
  6. 2017Enhanced Deep Residual Networks for Single Image Super-Resolutioncited by 1,552
  7. 2016Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpaintingcited by 1,428
  8. 2016Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoisingcited by 1,358
  9. 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,098
  10. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
  11. 2018Residual Dense Network for Image Super-Resolutioncited by 799
  12. 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 637
38 more
  1. 2019MaskGAN: Towards Diverse and Interactive Facial Image Manipulationcited by 628
  2. 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 599
  3. 2018Free-Form Image Inpainting with Gated Convolutioncited by 594
  4. 2018Generative Image Inpainting with Contextual Attentioncited by 580
  5. 2018Noise2Noise: Learning Image Restoration without Clean Datacited by 533
  6. 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 479
  7. 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
  8. 2020Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flowcited by 471
  9. 2017Compressed Sensing using Generative Modelscited by 339
  10. 2020The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Pre-trained BERT Networkscited by 275
  11. 2018Toward Convolutional Blind Denoising of Real Photographscited by 274
  12. 2020Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruningcited by 240
  13. 2020Pruning Neural Networks at Initialization: Why are We Missing the Mark?cited by 182
  14. 2019Drawing Early-Bird Tickets: Towards More Efficient Training of Deep Networkscited by 160
  15. 2018Deep Decoder: Concise Image Representations from Untrained Non-convolutional Networkscited by 120
  16. 2021A Unified Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Graph Neural Networkscited by 118
  17. 2020The Early Phase of Neural Network Trainingcited by 115
  18. 2018"Double-DIP": Unsupervised Image Decomposition via Coupled Deep-Image-Priorscited by 114
  19. 2019One ticket to win them all: generalizing lottery ticket initializations across datasets and optimizerscited by 102
  20. 2019Winning the Lottery with Continuous Sparsificationcited by 100
  21. 2020The Lottery Tickets Hypothesis for Supervised and Self-supervised Pre-training in Computer Vision Modelscited by 91
  22. 2019DeepRED: Deep Image Prior Powered by REDcited by 85
  23. 2018Phase Retrieval Under a Generative Priorcited by 73
  24. 2019Playing the lottery with rewards and multiple languages: lottery tickets in RL and NLPcited by 73
  25. 2019Time-Dependent Deep Image Prior for Dynamic MRIcited by 70
  26. 2018Image Restoration using Total Variation Regularized Deep Image Priorcited by 65
  27. 2019The Difficulty of Training Sparse Neural Networkscited by 62
  28. 2019A Bayesian Perspective on the Deep Image Priorcited by 52
  29. 2021Playing Lottery Tickets with Vision and Languagecited by 45
  30. 2022Sparsity Winning Twice: Better Robust Generalization from More Efficient Trainingcited by 41
  31. 2019Denoising and Regularization via Exploiting the Structural Bias of Convolutional Generatorscited by 40
  32. 2021Rethinking Deep Image Prior for Denoisingcited by 38
  33. 2017Global Guarantees for Enforcing Deep Generative Priors by Empirical Riskcited by 37
  34. 2020The Effects of Mild Over-parameterization on the Optimization Landscape of Shallow ReLU Neural Networkscited by 33
  35. 2020Robust Compressed Sensing using Generative Modelscited by 33
  36. 2021GANs Can Play Lottery Tickets Toocited by 32
  37. 2019Information-Theoretic Lower Bounds for Compressive Sensing with Generative Modelscited by 25
  38. 2021Data-Efficient GAN Training Beyond (Just) Augmentations: A Lottery Ticket Perspectivecited by 25

50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.