SVIP: Towards Verifiable Inference of Open-source Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The ever-increasing size of open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) renders local deployment impractical for individual users. Decentralized computing has emerged as a cost-effective solution, allowing individuals and small companies to perform LLM inference for users using surplus computational power. However, a computing provider may stealthily substitute the requested LLM with a smaller, less capable model without consent from users, thereby benefiting from cost savings. We introduce SVIP, a secret-based verifiable LLM inference protocol. Unlike existing solutions based on cryptographic or game-theoretic techniques, our method is computationally effective and does not rest on strong assumptions. Our protocol requires the computing provider to return both the generated text and processed hidden representations from LLMs. We then train a proxy task on these representations, effectively transforming them into a unique model identifier. With our protocol, users can reliably verify whether the computing provider is acting honestly. A carefully integrated secret mechanism further strengthens its security. We thoroughly analyze our protocol under multiple strong and adaptive adversarial scenarios. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that SVIP is accurate, generalizable, computationally efficient, and resistant to various attacks. Notably, SVIP achieves false negative rates below 5% and false positive rates below 3%, while requiring less than 0.01 seconds per prompt query for verification.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2024.
Builds on
28 of 65 references.
References · 28
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
16 more
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
- 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
- 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 711
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
- 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 449
- 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 224
- 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 208
- 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 100
- 2023On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 72
- 2024Instructional Fingerprinting of Large Language Modelscited by 64
- 2021Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning with Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Deep Neural Networkcited by 57
- 2024zkLLM: Zero Knowledge Proofs for Large Language Modelscited by 51
- 2017SafetyNets: Verifiable Execution of Deep Neural Networks on an Untrusted Cloudcited by 50
- 2019VeriML: Enabling Integrity Assurances and Fair Payments for Machine Learning as a Servicecited by 26
- 2013Time-Optimal Interactive Proofs for Circuit Evaluationcited by 14
- 2023Verifiable Privacy-Preserving Computingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2025Are You Getting What You Pay For? Auditing Model Substitution in LLM APIscited by 35
- 2026Real Money, Fake Models: Deceptive Model Claims in Shadow APIscited by 8
- 2026AI Identity: Standards, Gaps, and Research Directions for AI Agentscited by 5
- 2026Towards Verifiable AI with Lightweight Cryptographic Proofs of Inferencecited by 0
- 2026Committed SAE-Feature Traces for Audited-Session Substitution Detection in Hosted LLMscited by 0
- 2026Towards Computational Provenance: Carrying Causal-State Evidence in Generated Textcited by 0
- 2026Towards Computational Provenance: Carrying Causal-State Evidence in Generated Text17 Aug 2026
- 2026AI Identity: Standards, Gaps, and Research Directions for AI Agents25 Apr 2026
- 2026Committed SAE-Feature Traces for Audited-Session Substitution Detection in Hosted LLMs20 Apr 2026
- 2026Towards Verifiable AI with Lightweight Cryptographic Proofs of Inference19 Mar 2026
- 2026Real Money, Fake Models: Deceptive Model Claims in Shadow APIs2 Mar 2026
- 2025Are You Getting What You Pay For? Auditing Model Substitution in LLM APIs7 Apr 2025