Differentiable Inductive Logic Programming for Fraud Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current trends in Machine Learning prefer explainability even when it comes at the cost of performance. Therefore, explainable AI methods are particularly important in the field of Fraud Detection. This work investigates the applicability of Differentiable Inductive Logic Programming (DILP) as an explainable AI approach to Fraud Detection. Although the scalability of DILP is a well-known issue, we show that with some data curation such as cleaning and adjusting the tabular and numerical data to the expected format of background facts statements, it becomes much more applicable. While in processing it does not provide any significant advantage on rather more traditional methods such as Decision Trees, or more recent ones like Deep Symbolic Classification, it still gives comparable results. We showcase its limitations and points to improve, as well as potential use cases where it can be much more useful compared to traditional methods, such as recursive rule learning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2024.
Builds on
7 of 25 references.
References · 7
- 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
- 2017Learning Explanatory Rules from Noisy Datacited by 210
- 2019Inductive Logic Programming via Differentiable Deep Neural Logic Networkscited by 25
- 2021Learning Accurate and Interpretable Decision Rule Sets from Neural Networkscited by 25
- 2022Differentiable Rule Induction with Learned Relational Featurescited by 8
- 2023Explainable Fraud Detection with Deep Symbolic Classificationcited by 7
- 2023Neural-based classification rule learning for sequential datacited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.