mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explainable Fraud Detection with Deep Symbolic Classification

arXiv 2312.00586 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is a growing demand for explainable, transparent, and data-driven models within the domain of fraud detection. Decisions made by fraud detection models need to be explainable in the event of a customer dispute. Additionally, the decision-making process in the model must be transparent to win the trust of regulators and business stakeholders. At the same time, fraud detection solutions can benefit from data due to the noisy, dynamic nature of fraud and the availability of large historical data sets. Finally, fraud detection is notorious for its class imbalance: there are typically several orders of magnitude more legitimate transactions than fraudulent ones. In this paper, we present Deep Symbolic Classification (DSC), an extension of the Deep Symbolic Regression framework to classification problems. DSC casts classification as a search problem in the space of all analytic functions composed of a vocabulary of variables, constants, and operations and optimizes for an arbitrary evaluation metric directly. The search is guided by a deep neural network trained with reinforcement learning. Because the functions are mathematical expressions that are in closed-form and concise, the model is inherently explainable both at the level of a single classification decision and the model's decision process. Furthermore, the class imbalance problem is successfully addressed by optimizing for metrics that are robust to class imbalance such as the F1 score. This eliminates the need for oversampling and undersampling techniques that plague traditional approaches. Finally, the model allows to explicitly balance between the prediction accuracy and the explainability. An evaluation on the PaySim data set demonstrates competitive predictive performance with state-of-the-art models, while surpassing them in terms of explainability. This establishes DSC as a promising model for fraud detection systems.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2023.

Builds on

10 of 34 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
  3. 2019Algorithms for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
  4. 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 209
  5. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 198
  6. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 195
  7. 2021Symbolic Regression via Neural-Guided Genetic Programming Population Seedingcited by 97
  8. 2020Explaining the Explainer: A First Theoretical Analysis of LIMEcited by 89
  9. 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Reviewcited by 79
  10. 2022Binary and Multinomial Classification through Evolutionary Symbolic Regressioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

7 papers.