Explainable Fraud Detection with Deep Symbolic Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There is a growing demand for explainable, transparent, and data-driven models within the domain of fraud detection. Decisions made by fraud detection models need to be explainable in the event of a customer dispute. Additionally, the decision-making process in the model must be transparent to win the trust of regulators and business stakeholders. At the same time, fraud detection solutions can benefit from data due to the noisy, dynamic nature of fraud and the availability of large historical data sets. Finally, fraud detection is notorious for its class imbalance: there are typically several orders of magnitude more legitimate transactions than fraudulent ones. In this paper, we present Deep Symbolic Classification (DSC), an extension of the Deep Symbolic Regression framework to classification problems. DSC casts classification as a search problem in the space of all analytic functions composed of a vocabulary of variables, constants, and operations and optimizes for an arbitrary evaluation metric directly. The search is guided by a deep neural network trained with reinforcement learning. Because the functions are mathematical expressions that are in closed-form and concise, the model is inherently explainable both at the level of a single classification decision and the model's decision process. Furthermore, the class imbalance problem is successfully addressed by optimizing for metrics that are robust to class imbalance such as the F1 score. This eliminates the need for oversampling and undersampling techniques that plague traditional approaches. Finally, the model allows to explicitly balance between the prediction accuracy and the explainability. An evaluation on the PaySim data set demonstrates competitive predictive performance with state-of-the-art models, while surpassing them in terms of explainability. This establishes DSC as a promising model for fraud detection systems.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2023.
Builds on
10 of 34 references.
References · 10
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
- 2019Algorithms for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
- 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 209
- 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 198
- 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 195
- 2021Symbolic Regression via Neural-Guided Genetic Programming Population Seedingcited by 97
- 2020Explaining the Explainer: A First Theoretical Analysis of LIMEcited by 89
- 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Reviewcited by 79
- 2022Binary and Multinomial Classification through Evolutionary Symbolic Regressioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024Differentiable Inductive Logic Programming for Fraud Detectioncited by 1
- 2025Symbolic Quantile Regression for the Interpretable Prediction of Conditional Quantilescited by 1
- 2026Unsupervised Symbolic Anomaly Detectioncited by 1
- 2024Integrating Fuzzy Logic into Deep Symbolic Regressioncited by 0
- 2025Detecting Fraud in Financial Networks: A Semi-Supervised GNN Approach with Granger-Causal Explanationscited by 0
- 2025CleverCatch: A Knowledge-Guided Weak Supervision Model for Fraud Detectioncited by 0
- 2026ECSEL: Explainable Classification via Signomial Equation Learningcited by 0
- 2026Unsupervised Symbolic Anomaly Detection18 Mar 2026
- 2026ECSEL: Explainable Classification via Signomial Equation Learning29 Jan 2026
- 2025CleverCatch: A Knowledge-Guided Weak Supervision Model for Fraud Detection15 Oct 2025
- 2025Symbolic Quantile Regression for the Interpretable Prediction of Conditional Quantiles11 Aug 2025
- 2025Detecting Fraud in Financial Networks: A Semi-Supervised GNN Approach with Granger-Causal Explanations25 Jun 2025
- 2024Integrating Fuzzy Logic into Deep Symbolic Regression1 Nov 2024
- 2024Differentiable Inductive Logic Programming for Fraud Detection29 Oct 2024