Angel or Devil: Discriminating Hard Samples and Anomaly Contaminations for Unsupervised Time Series Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training in unsupervised time series anomaly detection is constantly plagued by the discrimination between harmful `anomaly contaminations' and beneficial `hard normal samples'. These two samples exhibit analogous loss behavior that conventional loss-based methodologies struggle to differentiate. To tackle this problem, we propose a novel approach that supplements traditional loss behavior with `parameter behavior', enabling a more granular characterization of anomalous patterns. Parameter behavior is formalized by measuring the parametric response to minute perturbations in input samples. Leveraging the complementary nature of parameter and loss behaviors, we further propose a dual Parameter-Loss Data Augmentation method (termed PLDA), implemented within the reinforcement learning paradigm. During the training phase of anomaly detection, PLDA dynamically augments the training data through an iterative process that simultaneously mitigates anomaly contaminations while amplifying informative hard normal samples. PLDA demonstrates remarkable versatility, which can serve as an additional component that seamlessly integrated with existing anomaly detectors to enhance their detection performance. Extensive experiments on ten datasets show that PLDA significantly improves the performance of four distinct detectors by up to 8%, outperforming three state-of-the-art data augmentation methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2024.
Builds on
28 of 51 references.
References · 28
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2022TimesNet: Temporal 2D-Variation Modeling for General Time Series Analysiscited by 1,030
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2018Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 407
- 2021Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association Discrepancycited by 387
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2022TranAD: Deep Transformer Networks for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 211
- 2018A Deep Neural Network for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis in Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 181
- 2020Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Reviewcited by 159
- 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
- 2022Deep Learning for Time Series Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 130
- 2018Gradient Harmonized Single-stage Detectorcited by 114
16 more
- 2023DCdetector: Dual Attention Contrastive Representation Learning for Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 103
- 2021Neural Transformation Learning for Deep Anomaly Detection Beyond Imagescited by 98
- 2021An Evaluation of Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis in Multivariate Time Seriescited by 68
- 2019Deep Weakly-supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 59
- 2021Neural Contextual Anomaly Detection for Time Seriescited by 42
- 2021Unsupervised Deep Anomaly Detection for Multi-Sensor Time-Series Signalscited by 41
- 2022Calibrated One-class Classification for Unsupervised Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 39
- 2021Unsupervised Time Series Outlier Detection with Diversity-Driven Convolutional Ensembles -- Extended Versioncited by 35
- 2021Time Series Anomaly Detection for Cyber-Physical Systems via Neural System Identification and Bayesian Filteringcited by 31
- 2021Noise-resistant Deep Metric Learning with Ranking-based Instance Selectioncited by 23
- 2022Robust and Explainable Autoencoders for Unsupervised Time Series Outlier Detection---Extended Versioncited by 19
- 2023Graph-level Anomaly Detection via Hierarchical Memory Networkscited by 16
- 2023RoSAS: Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection with Contamination-Resilient Continuous Supervisioncited by 11
- 2021Estimating the electrical power output of industrial devices with end-to-end time-series classification in the presence of label noisecited by 10
- 2019Empirical Study of Easy and Hard Examples in CNN Trainingcited by 9
- 2023Differences Between Hard and Noisy-labeled Samples: An Empirical Studycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.