mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hybrid Deep Learning for Legal Text Analysis: Predicting Punishment Durations in Indonesian Court Rulings

arXiv 2410.20104 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Limited public understanding of legal processes and inconsistent verdicts in the Indonesian court system led to widespread dissatisfaction and increased stress on judges. This study addresses these issues by developing a deep learning-based predictive system for court sentence lengths. Our hybrid model, combining CNN and BiLSTM with attention mechanism, achieved an R-squared score of 0.5893, effectively capturing both local patterns and long-term dependencies in legal texts. While document summarization proved ineffective, using only the top 30% most frequent tokens increased prediction performance, suggesting that focusing on core legal terminology balances information retention and computational efficiency. We also implemented a modified text normalization process, addressing common errors like misspellings and incorrectly merged words, which significantly improved the model's performance. These findings have important implications for automating legal document processing, aiding both professionals and the public in understanding court judgments. By leveraging advanced NLP techniques, this research contributes to enhancing transparency and accessibility in the Indonesian legal system, paving the way for more consistent and comprehensible legal decisions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2024.

Builds on

4 of 30 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligencecited by 129
  2. 2023Zero-shot Transfer of Article-aware Legal Outcome Classification for European Court of Human Rights Casescited by 14
  3. 2023From Dissonance to Insights: Dissecting Disagreements in Rationale Construction for Case Outcome Classificationcited by 14
  4. 2023Legal Extractive Summarization of U.S. Court Opinionscited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.