TEARS: Textual Representations for Scrutable Recommendations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Traditional recommender systems rely on high-dimensional (latent) embeddings for modeling user-item interactions, often resulting in opaque representations that lack interpretability. Moreover, these systems offer limited control to users over their recommendations. Inspired by recent work, we introduce TExtuAl Representations for Scrutable recommendations (TEARS) to address these challenges. Instead of representing a user's interests through a latent embedding, TEARS encodes them in natural text, providing transparency and allowing users to edit them. To do so, TEARS uses a modern LLM to generate user summaries based on user preferences. We find the summaries capture user preferences uniquely. Using these summaries, we take a hybrid approach where we use an optimal transport procedure to align the summaries' representation with the learned representation of a standard VAE for collaborative filtering. We find this approach can surpass the performance of three popular VAE models while providing user-controllable recommendations. We also analyze the controllability of TEARS through three simulated user tasks to evaluate the effectiveness of a user editing its summary.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2024.
Builds on
29 of 62 references.
References · 29
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2020LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendationcited by 1,134
- 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2019Neural Graph Collaborative Filteringcited by 660
- 2017Wasserstein GANcited by 635
- 2018Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 308
- 2023Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Rankers for Recommender Systemscited by 307
- 2023Chat-REC: Towards Interactive and Explainable LLMs-Augmented Recommender Systemcited by 241
17 more
- 2023Representation Learning with Large Language Models for Recommendationcited by 155
- 2023Large Language Models as Zero-Shot Conversational Recommenderscited by 126
- 2023How to Index Item IDs for Recommendation Foundation Modelscited by 102
- 2019Embarrassingly Shallow Autoencoders for Sparse Datacited by 93
- 2017Joint Deep Modeling of Users and Items Using Reviews for Recommendationcited by 84
- 2023Large Language Models are Competitive Near Cold-start Recommenders for Language- and Item-based Preferencescited by 66
- 2021Counterfactual Explainable Recommendationcited by 60
- 2023VIP5: Towards Multimodal Foundation Models for Recommendationcited by 45
- 2024Beyond Concept Bottleneck Models: How to Make Black Boxes Intervenable?cited by 28
- 2024Integrating Large Language Models into Recommendation via Mutual Augmentation and Adaptive Aggregationcited by 26
- 2024Transparent and Scrutable Recommendations Using Natural Language User Profilescited by 24
- 2023Explainable Recommendation with Personalized Review Retrieval and Aspect Learningcited by 19
- 2023Large Language Models are Not Stable Recommender Systemscited by 13
- 2024End-to-end Training for Recommendation with Language-based User Profilescited by 10
- 2023Recommendations by Concise User Profiles from Review Textcited by 5
- 2021A Comprehensive Overview of Recommender System and Sentiment Analysiscited by 3
- 2023KNNs of Semantic Encodings for Rating Predictioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025Interactive Recommendation Agent with Active User Commandscited by 10
- 2025CTRL-Rec: Controlling Recommender Systems With Natural Languagecited by 4
- 2026High Fidelity Textual User Representation over Heterogeneous Sources via Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026SteerEval: A Framework for Evaluating Steerability with Natural Language Profiles for Recommendationcited by 0
- 2026Textual User Taste: Natural-Language User Context for Foundation-Model Recommender System at Scalecited by 0
- 2026Textual User Taste: Natural-Language User Context for Foundation-Model Recommender System at Scale28 Sep 2026
- 2026High Fidelity Textual User Representation over Heterogeneous Sources via Reinforcement Learning7 Feb 2026
- 2026SteerEval: A Framework for Evaluating Steerability with Natural Language Profiles for Recommendation28 Jan 2026
- 2025CTRL-Rec: Controlling Recommender Systems With Natural Language14 Oct 2025
- 2025Interactive Recommendation Agent with Active User Commands25 Sep 2025