Label Set Optimization via Activation Distribution Kurtosis for Zero-shot Classification with Generative Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In-context learning (ICL) performance is highly sensitive to prompt design, yet the impact of class label options (e.g. lexicon or order) in zero-shot classification remains underexplored. This study proposes LOADS (Label set Optimization via Activation Distribution kurtosiS), a post-hoc method for selecting optimal label sets in zero-shot ICL with large language models (LLMs). LOADS is built upon the observations in our empirical analysis, the first to systematically examine how label option design (i.e., lexical choice, order, and elaboration) impacts classification performance. This analysis shows that the lexical choice of the labels in the prompt (such as agree vs. support in stance classification) plays an important role in both model performance and model's sensitivity to the label order. A further investigation demonstrates that optimal label words tend to activate fewer outlier neurons in LLMs' feed-forward networks. LOADS then leverages kurtosis to measure the neuron activation distribution for label selection, requiring only a single forward pass without gradient propagation or labelled data. The LOADS-selected label words consistently demonstrate effectiveness for zero-shot ICL across classification tasks, datasets, models and languages, achieving maximum performance gain from 0.54 to 0.76 compared to the conventional approach of using original dataset label words.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2024.
Builds on
47 of 71 references.
References · 47
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
- 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,256
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
- 2017Sigmoid-Weighted Linear Units for Neural Network Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 950
- 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 938
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
35 more
- 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 868
- 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 648
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
- 2022RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learningcited by 366
- 2023In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space Steeringcited by 245
- 2023Label Words are Anchors: An Information Flow Perspective for Understanding In-Context Learningcited by 236
- 2021WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgrammingcited by 221
- 2022Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimationcited by 216
- 2021How Many Data Points is a Prompt Worth?cited by 198
- 2022Active Example Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 196
- 2022Ground-Truth Labels Matter: A Deeper Look into Input-Label Demonstrationscited by 116
- 2023Don't Trust ChatGPT when Your Question is not in English: A Study of Multilingual Abilities and Types of LLMscited by 104
- 2020Zero-Shot Stance Detection: A Dataset and Model using Generalized Topic Representationscited by 98
- 2023Neurons in Large Language Models: Dead, N-gram, Positionalcited by 88
- 2018RumourEval 2019: Determining Rumour Veracity and Support for Rumourscited by 75
- 2019Seeing Things from a Different Angle: Discovering Diverse Perspectives about Claimscited by 74
- 2019A Richly Annotated Corpus for Different Tasks in Automated Fact-Checkingcited by 74
- 2022Self-Generated In-Context Learning: Leveraging Auto-regressive Language Models as a Demonstration Generatorcited by 68
- 2024Revisiting Demonstration Selection Strategies in In-Context Learningcited by 58
- 2022A Close Look into the Calibration of Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 57
- 2024Confidence Regulation Neurons in Language Modelscited by 57
- 2023From Language Modeling to Instruction Following: Understanding the Behavior Shift in LLMs after Instruction Tuningcited by 56
- 2022Prototypical Verbalizer for Prompt-based Few-shot Tuningcited by 53
- 2018A Retrospective Analysis of the Fake News Challenge Stance Detection Taskcited by 49
- 2022Toward Human Readable Prompt Tuning: Kubrick's The Shining is a good movie, and a good prompt too?cited by 49
- 2024Let's Learn Step by Step: Enhancing In-Context Learning Ability with Curriculum Learningcited by 47
- 2023Pruning vs Quantization: Which is Better?cited by 46
- 2024Dual Operating Modes of In-Context Learningcited by 43
- 2021Cross-Domain Label-Adaptive Stance Detectioncited by 30
- 2024In-Context Example Ordering Guided by Label Distributionscited by 12
- 2023Not All Demonstration Examples are Equally Beneficial: Reweighting Demonstration Examples for In-Context Learningcited by 9
- 2023SuperTweetEval: A Challenging, Unified and Heterogeneous Benchmark for Social Media NLP Researchcited by 9
- 2024Benchmarking zero-shot stance detection with FlanT5-XXL: Insights from training data, prompting, and decoding strategies into its near-SoTA performancecited by 6
- 2023Do prompt positions really matter?cited by 5
- 2020Measuring What Counts: The case of Rumour Stance Classificationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.