mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TRIAGE: Ethical Benchmarking of AI Models Through Mass Casualty Simulations

arXiv 2410.18991 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2024cs.CY cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present the TRIAGE Benchmark, a novel machine ethics (ME) benchmark that tests LLMs' ability to make ethical decisions during mass casualty incidents. It uses real-world ethical dilemmas with clear solutions designed by medical professionals, offering a more realistic alternative to annotation-based benchmarks. TRIAGE incorporates various prompting styles to evaluate model performance across different contexts. Most models consistently outperformed random guessing, suggesting LLMs may support decision-making in triage scenarios. Neutral or factual scenario formulations led to the best performance, unlike other ME benchmarks where ethical reminders improved outcomes. Adversarial prompts reduced performance but not to random guessing levels. Open-source models made more morally serious errors, and general capability overall predicted better performance.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.

Builds on

9 of 17 references.

References · 9

  1. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  2. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
  3. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
  4. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
  5. 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 723
  6. 2023Scalable and Transferable Black-Box Jailbreaks for Language Models via Persona Modulationcited by 214
  7. 2023Do the Rewards Justify the Means? Measuring Trade-Offs Between Rewards and Ethical Behavior in the MACHIAVELLI Benchmarkcited by 182
  8. 2024When Benchmarks are Targets: Revealing the Sensitivity of Large Language Model Leaderboardscited by 137
  9. 2023When Large Language Models contradict humans? Large Language Models' Sycophantic Behaviourcited by 62

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Language Models are Alignable Decision-Makers: Dataset and Application to the Medical Triage Domain
  2. 2025Auditing the Ethical Logic of Generative AI Models
  3. 2025EthicsMH: A Pilot Benchmark for Ethical Reasoning in Mental Health AI
  4. 2025Survival Games: Human-LLM Strategic Showdowns under Severe Resource Scarcity
  5. 2026Are LLMs Bad at Moral Reasoning?
  6. 2024MoralBench: Moral Evaluation of LLMs
  7. 2026PreAct-Bench: Benchmarking Predictive Monitoring in LLMs
  8. 2026Beyond Binary Moral Judgment: Modeling Ethical Pluralism in AI