TP-Eval: Tap Multimodal LLMs' Potential in Evaluation by Customizing Prompts
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have received much attention for their impressive capabilities. The evaluation of MLLMs is becoming critical to analyzing attributes of MLLMs and providing valuable insights. However, current benchmarks overlook the problem of prompt sensitivity - minor prompt variations may lead to significant performance fluctuations. Thus, inappropriate prompts may obscure the models' capabilities, underestimating the models' performance. Moreover, different models have different preferences for different prompts, and thus, using the same prompt for all models will cause evaluation bias. This paper analyzes this deficiency in existing benchmarks and further introduces a new evaluation framework named TP-Eval, which introduces a prompt customization method to reduce evaluation biases and tap models' potential. TP-Eval will rewrite the original prompts to different customized prompts for different models. In particular, we propose some well-designed modules for prompt customization tailored to the scenario of MLLM evaluation. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach to uncovering models' capabilities, and TP-Eval should benefit the community in developing more comprehensive and convincing MLLM evaluation benchmarks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 11 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2024.
Builds on
11 of 23 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 10
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
- 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 653
- 2022GrIPS: Gradient-free, Edit-based Instruction Search for Prompting Large Language Modelscited by 127
- 2022TEMPERA: Test-Time Prompting via Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
- 2024Unleashing the Potential of Large Language Models as Prompt Optimizers: Analogical Analysis with Gradient-based Model Optimizerscited by 35
- 2023InstOptima: Evolutionary Multi-objective Instruction Optimization via Large Language Model-based Instruction Operatorscited by 17
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023MLLM-Bench: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs with Per-sample Criteria
- 2024MME-Survey: A Comprehensive Survey on Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs
- 2025Multimodal Prompt Optimization: Why Not Leverage Multiple Modalities for MLLMs
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2024How Easy is It to Fool Your Multimodal LLMs? An Empirical Analysis on Deceptive Prompts
- 2025Promptception: How Sensitive Are Large Multimodal Models to Prompts?
- 2024MIA-Bench: Towards Better Instruction Following Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs
- 2025Self-Improvement in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey