Who is Undercover? Guiding LLMs to Explore Multi-Perspective Team Tactic in the Game
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are pivotal AI agents in complex tasks but still face challenges in open decision-making problems within complex scenarios. To address this, we use the language logic game ``Who is Undercover?'' (WIU) as an experimental platform to propose the Multi-Perspective Team Tactic (MPTT) framework. MPTT aims to cultivate LLMs' human-like language expression logic, multi-dimensional thinking, and self-perception in complex scenarios. By alternating speaking and voting sessions, integrating techniques like self-perspective, identity-determination, self-reflection, self-summary and multi-round find-teammates, LLM agents make rational decisions through strategic concealment and communication, fostering human-like trust. Preliminary results show that MPTT, combined with WIU, leverages LLMs' cognitive capabilities to create a decision-making framework that can simulate real society. This framework aids minority groups in communication and expression, promoting fairness and diversity in decision-making. Additionally, our Human-in-the-loop experiments demonstrate that LLMs can learn and align with human behaviors through interactive, indicating their potential for active participation in societal decision-making.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2024.
Builds on
18 of 33 references.
References · 18
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
- 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improvecited by 656
- 2023AgentTuning: Enabling Generalized Agent Abilities for LLMscited by 319
- 2023Exploring Large Language Models for Communication Games: An Empirical Study on Werewolfcited by 238
- 2022Language models show human-like content effects on reasoning taskscited by 171
6 more
- 2023Avalon's Game of Thoughts: Battle Against Deception through Recursive Contemplationcited by 102
- 2023Deception Abilities Emerged in Large Language Modelscited by 99
- 2023Combating Misinformation in the Age of LLMs: Opportunities and Challengescited by 94
- 2022When to Make Exceptions: Exploring Language Models as Accounts of Human Moral Judgmentcited by 93
- 2023Interactive Natural Language Processingcited by 31
- 2019Limited Lookahead in Imperfect-Information Gamescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025LLMs as Policy-Agnostic Teammates: A Case Study in Human Proxy Design for Heterogeneous Agent Teams
- 2025Do as We Do, Not as You Think: the Conformity of Large Language Models
- 2024LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Models
- 2024Reproducing and Extending Experiments in Behavioral Strategy with Large Language Models
- 2025Computational Basis of LLM's Decision Making in Social Simulation
- 2026MINDGAMES: A Live Arena for Evaluating Social and Strategic Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs
- 2026CONSCIENTIA: Can LLM Agents Learn to Strategize? Emergent Deception and Trust in a Multi-Agent NYC Simulation
- 2025Understanding LLM Agent Behaviours via Game Theory: Strategy Recognition, Biases and Multi-Agent Dynamics