mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Debug Smarter, Not Harder: AI Agents for Error Resolution in Computational Notebooks

arXiv 2410.14393 ↗First posted 18 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Computational notebooks became indispensable tools for research-related development, offering unprecedented interactivity and flexibility in the development process. However, these benefits come at the cost of reproducibility and an increased potential for bugs. With the rise of code-fluent Large Language Models empowered with agentic techniques, smart bug-fixing tools with a high level of autonomy have emerged. However, those tools are tuned for classical script programming and still struggle with non-linear computational notebooks. In this paper, we present an AI agent designed specifically for error resolution in a computational notebook. We have developed an agentic system capable of exploring a notebook environment by interacting with it -- similar to how a user would -- and integrated the system into the JetBrains service for collaborative data science called Datalore. We evaluate our approach against the pre-existing single-action solution by comparing costs and conducting a user study. Users rate the error resolution capabilities of the agentic system higher but experience difficulties with UI. We share the results of the study and consider them valuable for further improving user-agent collaboration.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2024.

Builds on

10 of 41 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May
  2. 2024RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program Repair25 Mar
  3. 2024Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents1 Feb

Other references · 7

  1. 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,139
  2. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
  3. 2023Describe, Explain, Plan and Select: Interactive Planning with Large Language Models Enables Open-World Multi-Task Agentscited by 398
  4. 2024WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks?cited by 363
  5. 2023LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with Executioncited by 239
  6. 2024If LLM Is the Wizard, Then Code Is the Wand: A Survey on How Code Empowers Large Language Models to Serve as Intelligent Agentscited by 79
  7. 2024XC-Cache: Cross-Attending to Cached Context for Efficient LLM Inferencecited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Untangling Knots: Leveraging LLM for Error Resolution in Computational Notebooks
  2. 2025Interactive Debugging and Steering of Multi-Agent AI Systems
  3. 2025Towards Adaptive Software Agents for Debugging
  4. 2026SelfHeal: Empirical Fix Pattern Analysis and Bug Repair in LLM Agents
  5. 2024UniDebugger: Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Unified Software Debugging
  6. 2025AI Agentic Programming: A Survey of Techniques, Challenges, and Opportunities
  7. 2025Beyond Final Code: A Process-Oriented Error Analysis of Software Development Agents in Real-World GitHub Scenarios
  8. 2025DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems