mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Recurrent Neural Goodness-of-Fit Test for Time Series

arXiv 2410.13986 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2024stat.ML cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Time series data are crucial across diverse domains such as finance and healthcare, where accurate forecasting and decision-making rely on advanced modeling techniques. While generative models have shown great promise in capturing the intricate dynamics inherent in time series, evaluating their performance remains a major challenge. Traditional evaluation metrics fall short due to the temporal dependencies and potential high dimensionality of the features. In this paper, we propose the REcurrent NeurAL (RENAL) Goodness-of-Fit test, a novel and statistically rigorous framework for evaluating generative time series models. By leveraging recurrent neural networks, we transform the time series into conditionally independent data pairs, enabling the application of a chi-square-based goodness-of-fit test to the temporal dependencies within the data. This approach offers a robust, theoretically grounded solution for assessing the quality of generative models, particularly in settings with limited time sequences. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method across both synthetic and real-world datasets, outperforming existing methods in terms of reliability and accuracy. Our method fills a critical gap in the evaluation of time series generative models, offering a tool that is both practical and adaptable to high-stakes applications.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2024.

Builds on

24 of 61 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  3. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  4. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
  5. 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 995
  6. 2019Unsupervised Scalable Representation Learning for Multivariate Time Seriescited by 269
  7. 2020Transformer Hawkes Processcited by 235
  8. 2016A Kernel Test of Goodness of Fitcited by 143
  9. 2020Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Testscited by 130
  10. 2023Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospectscited by 99
  11. 2023Generative Time Series Forecasting with Diffusion, Denoise, and Disentanglementcited by 90
  12. 2021MMD Aggregated Two-Sample Testcited by 75
12 more
  1. 2016Interpretable Distribution Features with Maximum Testing Powercited by 63
  2. 2015Fast Two-Sample Testing with Analytic Representations of Probability Measurescited by 53
  3. 2017Wasserstein Learning of Deep Generative Point Process Modelscited by 46
  4. 2023FinDiff: Diffusion Models for Financial Tabular Data Generationcited by 41
  5. 2018Learning Temporal Point Processes via Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  6. 2019Two-sample Testing Using Deep Learningcited by 27
  7. 2023AutoDiff: combining Auto-encoder and Diffusion model for tabular data synthesizingcited by 24
  8. 2023Counterfactual Generative Models for Time-Varying Treatmentscited by 17
  9. 2021Neural Spectral Marked Point Processescited by 10
  10. 2019Sequential Adversarial Anomaly Detection for One-Class Event Datacited by 9
  11. 2022A kernel Stein test of goodness of fit for sequential modelscited by 9
  12. 2023Conditional Generative Modeling for High-dimensional Marked Temporal Point Processescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.