Efficient Recovery Learning using Model Predictive Meta-Reasoning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Operating under real world conditions is challenging due to the possibility of a wide range of failures induced by execution errors and state uncertainty. In relatively benign settings, such failures can be overcome by retrying or executing one of a small number of hand-engineered recovery strategies. By contrast, contact-rich sequential manipulation tasks, like opening doors and assembling furniture, are not amenable to exhaustive hand-engineering. To address this issue, we present a general approach for robustifying manipulation strategies in a sample-efficient manner. Our approach incrementally improves robustness by first discovering the failure modes of the current strategy via exploration in simulation and then learning additional recovery skills to handle these failures. To ensure efficient learning, we propose an online algorithm called Meta-Reasoning for Skill Learning (MetaReSkill) that monitors the progress of all recovery policies during training and allocates training resources to recoveries that are likely to improve the task performance the most. We use our approach to learn recovery skills for door-opening and evaluate them both in simulation and on a real robot with little fine-tuning. Compared to open-loop execution, our experiments show that even a limited amount of recovery learning improves task success substantially from 71% to 92.4% in simulation and from 75% to 90% on a real robot.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2022.
Builds on
8 of 35 references.
References · 8
- 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 484
- 2020Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Recovery Zonescited by 156
- 2018Robustness via Retrying: Closed-Loop Robotic Manipulation with Self-Supervised Learningcited by 19
- 2021Untangling Dense Non-Planar Knots by Learning Manipulation Features and Recovery Policiescited by 11
- 2021Interpreting Contact Interactions to Overcome Failure in Robot Assembly Taskscited by 9
- 2021LS3: Latent Space Safe Sets for Long-Horizon Visuomotor Control of Sparse Reward Iterative Taskscited by 9
- 2018Endowing Robots with Longer-term Autonomy by Recovering from External Disturbances in Manipulation through Grounded Anomaly Classification and Recovery Policiescited by 6
- 2022Automatic Encoding and Repair of Reactive High-Level Tasks with Learned Abstract Representationscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024Practice Makes Perfect: Planning to Learn Skill Parameter Policiescited by 22
- 2024RecoveryChaining: Learning Local Recovery Policies for Robust Manipulationcited by 8
- 2024Learning to Recover from Plan Execution Errors during Robot Manipulation: A Neuro-symbolic Approachcited by 3
- 2025SLAP: Shortcut Learning for Abstract Planningcited by 3
- 2024Learning to Bridge the Gap: Efficient Novelty Recovery with Planning and Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Deliberate Practice: Learning Robot Skills under a Budgetcited by 0
- 2026CARE: Experience-Guided Atomic Corrective Execution for Vision-Language-Action Policiescited by 0
- 2026CARE: Experience-Guided Atomic Corrective Execution for Vision-Language-Action Policies21 Sep 2026
- 2026Deliberate Practice: Learning Robot Skills under a Budget13 Aug 2026
- 2025SLAP: Shortcut Learning for Abstract Planning2 Nov 2025
- 2024RecoveryChaining: Learning Local Recovery Policies for Robust Manipulation17 Oct 2024
- 2024Learning to Bridge the Gap: Efficient Novelty Recovery with Planning and Reinforcement Learning28 Sep 2024
- 2024Learning to Recover from Plan Execution Errors during Robot Manipulation: A Neuro-symbolic Approach29 May 2024
- 2024Practice Makes Perfect: Planning to Learn Skill Parameter Policies22 Feb 2024