mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Using Protected Attributes to Consider Fairness in Multi-Agent Systems

arXiv 2410.12889 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2024cs.MA cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness in Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) has been extensively studied, particularly in reward distribution among agents in scenarios such as goods allocation, resource division, lotteries, and bargaining systems. Fairness in MAS depends on various factors, including the system's governing rules, the behaviour of the agents, and their characteristics. Yet, fairness in human society often involves evaluating disparities between disadvantaged and privileged groups, guided by principles of Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI). Taking inspiration from the work on algorithmic fairness, which addresses bias in machine learning-based decision-making, we define protected attributes for MAS as characteristics that should not disadvantage an agent in terms of its expected rewards. We adapt fairness metrics from the algorithmic fairness literature -- namely, demographic parity, counterfactual fairness, and conditional statistical parity -- to the multi-agent setting, where self-interested agents interact within an environment. These metrics allow us to evaluate the fairness of MAS, with the ultimate aim of designing MAS that do not disadvantage agents based on protected attributes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.

Builds on

15 of 39 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
  3. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  4. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  5. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  6. 2017Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoningcited by 194
  7. 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 144
  8. 2018Inequity aversion improves cooperation in intertemporal social dilemmascited by 106
  9. 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
  10. 2019Learning Fairness in Multi-Agent Systemscited by 44
  11. 2018Evolving intrinsic motivations for altruistic behaviorcited by 30
  12. 2022Fair Division of Indivisible Goods: Recent Progress and Open Questionscited by 21
3 more
  1. 2023Double-Deck Multi-Agent Pickup and Delivery: Multi-Robot Rearrangement in Large-Scale Warehousescited by 5
  2. 2022Fair Division with Prioritized Agentscited by 1
  3. 2023Fairly Allocating Goods and (Terrible) Chorescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.