Controlled Automatic Task-Specific Synthetic Data Generation for Hallucination Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a novel approach to automatically generate non-trivial task-specific synthetic datasets for hallucination detection. Our approach features a two-step generation-selection pipeline, using hallucination pattern guidance and a language style alignment during generation. Hallucination pattern guidance leverages the most important task-specific hallucination patterns while language style alignment aligns the style of the synthetic dataset with benchmark text. To obtain robust supervised detectors from synthetic datasets, we also adopt a data mixture strategy to improve performance robustness and generalization. Our results on three datasets show that our generated hallucination text is more closely aligned with non-hallucinated text versus baselines, to train hallucination detectors with better generalization. Our hallucination detectors trained on synthetic datasets outperform in-context-learning (ICL)-based detectors by a large margin of 32%. Our extensive experiments confirm the benefits of our approach with cross-task and cross-generator generalization. Our data-mixture-based training further improves the generalization and robustness of hallucination detection.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.
Builds on
17 of 30 references.
References · 17
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
- 2023Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Biascited by 232
- 2018Towards Deep Conversational Recommendationscited by 176
- 2023Med-HALT: Medical Domain Hallucination Test for Large Language Modelscited by 157
- 2023PaperQA: Retrieval-Augmented Generative Agent for Scientific Researchcited by 149
- 2024Beyond Functional Correctness: Exploring Hallucinations in LLM-Generated Codecited by 107
- 2023Generating Benchmarks for Factuality Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 105
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey on Process-Oriented Automatic Text Summarization with Exploration of LLM-Based Methodscited by 102
- 2023Evaluating the Code Quality of AI-Assisted Code Generation Tools: An Empirical Study on GitHub Copilot, Amazon CodeWhisperer, and ChatGPTcited by 71
5 more
- 2022ProGen: Progressive Zero-shot Dataset Generation via In-context Feedbackcited by 67
- 2023A New Benchmark and Reverse Validation Method for Passage-level Hallucination Detectioncited by 42
- 2023Fast and Accurate Factual Inconsistency Detection Over Long Documentscited by 23
- 2022SalesBot: Transitioning from Chit-Chat to Task-Oriented Dialoguescited by 16
- 2022Measuring the Measuring Tools: An Automatic Evaluation of Semantic Metrics for Text Corporacited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Lost in Speech: Trilingual Spoken Hallucination Detection Across Audio and Transcriptscited by 1
- 2026Quantifying Error Tolerance in Synthetic Data: An Atomic-level Operand vs. Operator Perturbation Studycited by 0
- 2026Vroom-Vroom at SHROOM-Visions: A Multi-Judge Committee for Detecting Hallucinated Spans in Vision-Language Outputscited by 0
- 2026Vroom-Vroom at SHROOM-Visions: A Multi-Judge Committee for Detecting Hallucinated Spans in Vision-Language Outputs15 Sep 2026
- 2026Quantifying Error Tolerance in Synthetic Data: An Atomic-level Operand vs. Operator Perturbation Study29 Aug 2026
- 2026Lost in Speech: Trilingual Spoken Hallucination Detection Across Audio and Transcripts25 Aug 2026