mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Table-LLM-Specialist: Language Model Specialists for Tables using Iterative Generator-Validator Fine-tuning

arXiv 2410.12164 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.DB cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language models such as GPT and Llama have shown remarkable ability on diverse natural language tasks, yet their performance on complex table tasks (e.g., NL-to-Code and data cleaning) remains suboptimal. Improving performance typically requires task-specific fine-tuning, which depends on expensive human labeling and is prone to overfitting. In this work, we propose Table-LLM-Specialist, a self-trained fine-tuning paradigm designed for table tasks. Our key insight is that many table tasks admit two dual formulations: a generative version and a classification version. Leveraging this duality, we introduce a Generator-Validator paradigm that iteratively generates and validates training data using language models, enabling effective fine-tuning without manually labeled data. Extensive evaluations on Llama, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4 show that Table-LLM-Specialist achieves (1) strong performance across diverse tasks compared to base models, for example, models fine-tuned on GPT-3.5 often surpass GPT-4 level quality; (2) lower deployment cost by enabling smaller models to reach high quality with reduced latency and cost; and (3) better generalization across multiple benchmarks, due to training on diverse, systematically generated data from real-world tables. Our code is available at https://github.com/microsoft/Table-Specialist. Models fine-tuned with Table-LLM-Specialist have been integrated into Microsoft Excel and are deployed in production for automated table data cleaning.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 124 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.

Builds on

42 of 124 references.

References · 42

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  5. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  6. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  7. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  8. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  9. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
  10. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  11. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
  12. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
30 more
  1. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,603
  2. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
  3. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  4. 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 812
  5. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 801
  6. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 687
  7. 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 565
  8. 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 515
  9. 2019TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verificationcited by 428
  10. 2023Orca: Progressive Learning from Complex Explanation Traces of GPT-4cited by 379
  11. 2017DualGAN: Unsupervised Dual Learning for Image-to-Image Translationcited by 310
  12. 2022Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verificationcited by 307
  13. 2022Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?cited by 175
  14. 2018A Study on Overfitting in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 174
  15. 2019Revisiting Self-Training for Neural Sequence Generationcited by 155
  16. 2016Dual Learning for Machine Translationcited by 148
  17. 2020Deep Entity Matching with Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 144
  18. 2023TableLlama: Towards Open Large Generalist Models for Tablescited by 137
  19. 2017SQLNet: Generating Structured Queries From Natural Language Without Reinforcement Learningcited by 135
  20. 2019Dual Student: Breaking the Limits of the Teacher in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 104
  21. 2017HoloClean: Holistic Data Repairs with Probabilistic Inferencecited by 79
  22. 2019Revisiting Low-Resource Neural Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 61
  23. 2024Learning From Failure: Integrating Negative Examples when Fine-tuning Large Language Models as Agentscited by 50
  24. 2020Valentine: Evaluating Matching Techniques for Dataset Discoverycited by 35
  25. 2023TAP4LLM: Table Provider on Sampling, Augmenting, and Packing Semi-structured Data for Large Language Model Reasoningcited by 32
  26. 2019HoloDetect: Few-Shot Learning for Error Detectioncited by 31
  27. 2024StructLM: Towards Building Generalist Models for Structured Knowledge Groundingcited by 29
  28. 2023Jellyfish: A Large Language Model for Data Preprocessingcited by 20
  29. 2020Summarizing and Exploring Tabular Data in Conversational Searchcited by 19
  30. 2023Auto-Tables: Synthesizing Multi-Step Transformations to Relationalize Tables without Using Examplescited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

8 papers.