Auto-Fill: Learning to Predict Missing Values Accurately with Specialist Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Predicting missing cell values in tabular data is a fundamental problem in data cleaning. While state-of-the-art reasoning models show great promise in predicting missing values in tables, by reasoning holistically across rows and columns, they are costly to deploy at scale and tend to be overconfident, often generating hallucinated or false-positive predictions. In this paper, we observe that achieving high-precision missing-value prediction in tables requires a distinct combination of three capabilities: (1) world knowledge, (2) text-based reasoning, and (3) code-based reasoning. We systematically explore design choices for combining these capabilities, and propose an Auto-Fill approach that post-trains three specialist small language models (SLMs), each optimized for one capability. We develop a calibrated ensemble mechanism that either dynamically selects the most confident specialist or abstains, ensuring high accuracy. Extensive experiments on 11 benchmarks with 2200 real tables drawn from diverse domains show that Auto-Fill achieves superior accuracy compared to state-of-the-art reasoning models (e.g., o3-pro, Gemini 3 Pro, and DeepSeek R1), while operating at a fraction (less than 1%) of the cost of these frontier models. Our results highlight the effectiveness of specialization and calibrated abstention in the important domain of tabular data. Auto-Fill is publicly available at https://github.com/lyrain2001/auto-fill.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2026.
Builds on
33 of 75 references.
References · 33
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,139
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
- 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,181
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
- 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,076
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
- 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 674
- 2024SWIFT:A Scalable lightWeight Infrastructure for Fine-Tuningcited by 355
- 2025Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AIcited by 270
21 more
- 2023A Survey of Confidence Estimation and Calibration in Large Language Modelscited by 256
- 2023Head-to-Tail: How Knowledgeable are Large Language Models (LLMs)? A.K.A. Will LLMs Replace Knowledge Graphs?cited by 168
- 2022MRKL Systems: A modular, neuro-symbolic architecture that combines large language models, external knowledge sources and discrete reasoningcited by 156
- 2023TableLlama: Towards Open Large Generalist Models for Tablescited by 137
- 2024Mind Your Step (by Step): Chain-of-Thought can Reduce Performance on Tasks where Thinking Makes Humans Worsecited by 109
- 2024Calibrating the Confidence of Large Language Models by Eliciting Fidelitycited by 47
- 2020Dataset Discovery in Data Lakescited by 31
- 2024LLM-Forest: Ensemble Learning of LLMs with Graph-Augmented Prompts for Data Imputationcited by 25
- 2017BoostClean: Automated Error Detection and Repair for Machine Learningcited by 23
- 2025Trained on Tokens, Calibrated on Concepts: The Emergence of Semantic Calibration in LLMscited by 19
- 2025MMTU: A Massive Multi-Task Table Understanding and Reasoning Benchmarkcited by 14
- 2025On LLM-Enhanced Mixed-Type Data Imputation with High-Order Message Passingcited by 11
- 2025Read Your Own Mind: Reasoning Helps Surface Self-Confidence Signals in LLMscited by 10
- 2026Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMscited by 9
- 2024Table-LLM-Specialist: Language Model Specialists for Tables using Iterative Generator-Validator Fine-tuningcited by 8
- 2021Auto-Validate: Unsupervised Data Validation Using Data-Domain Patterns Inferred from Data Lakescited by 7
- 2023Auto-BI: Automatically Build BI-Models Leveraging Local Join Prediction and Global Schema Graphcited by 7
- 2023Automatic Data Repair: Are We Ready to Deploy?cited by 5
- 2025Auto-Test: Learning Semantic-Domain Constraints for Unsupervised Error Detection in Tablescited by 2
- 2026Auto-Relate: A Unified Approach to Discovering Reliable Functional Relationships Leveraging Statistical Testscited by 1
- 2026When LLMs Read Tables Carelessly: Measuring and Reducing Data Referencing Errorscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024SketchFill: Sketch-Guided Code Generation for Imputing Derived Missing Values
- 2026When Retain Constraints Conflict: Mitigating Forget-Retain Interference in Tabular Data
- 2025TabularMath: Understanding Math Reasoning over Tables with Large Language Models
- 2026ReSS: Learning Reasoning Models for Tabular Data Prediction via Symbolic Scaffold
- 2023Rethinking Tabular Data Understanding with Large Language Models
- 2024FLEXTAF: Enhancing Table Reasoning with Flexible Tabular Formats
- 2025Utilizing Training Data to Improve LLM Reasoning for Tabular Understanding
- 2024NormTab: Improving Symbolic Reasoning in LLMs Through Tabular Data Normalization