Beyond IID: How General Are Tabular Foundation Models, Really?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundation models for predictive machine learning on tabular data have recently gained significant traction in academia and industry. Research communities across disciplines are increasingly evaluating tabular foundation models on diverse datasets and tasks. However, these task- and discipline-specific evaluations remain largely inaccessible to model researchers because benchmark software and evaluation protocols are fragmented. As a result, model researchers rely on standard benchmarks, which are mostly defined for tasks where tabular foundation models already excel. The most challenging scenarios are excluded, limiting meaningful progress in the field by focusing on marginal improvements on IID data rather than on broader, more demanding challenges. To overcome this, we introduce BeyondArena, the first unified holistic benchmark for tabular data that supports diverse task types (IID, temporal, grouped), across sample size and feature dimensionality scales, with diverse feature types (with text, with high cardinality) from a broad range of disciplines. To enable unified benchmarking beyond standard benchmarks, we introduce Data Foundry, a Python framework and metadata schema for curating tabular datasets for predictive machine learning. Our results across 11 models and 142 curated datasets show that existing tabular foundation models excel on tiny- to medium-sized IID data, while traditional tree-based and deep learning models still dominate on non-IID, large, and high-dimensional datasets. BeyondArena guides model research for the most demanding challenges in tabular data, enabling progress towards truly foundational tabular models.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 10.
10 papers.
- 2026Advancing Open and Reproducible Relational Learning: RelArena-α, TabPFN-Rel and RPIcited by 2
- 2026Causilo Technical Reportcited by 1
- 2026From field-scale to large-scale spectral libraries: Tabular foundation models in soil spectroscopycited by 0
- 2026The Illusion of Replacement: Rethinking Specialized Machine Learning Models in the Foundation Model Eracited by 0
- 2026Do Tabular Foundation Models Know Physics? Contamination, Units, and the Deterministic Limitcited by 0
- 2026Attention Quantization for Tabular Foundation Modelscited by 0
- 2026PACE: Plug-and-Play Contextual Embedding for Feature Screening with Pretrained Tabular Foundation Modelscited by 0
- 2026What You Observe Determines How You Identify Causal Effects: Evaluating Causal Models across Observational Viewscited by 0
- 2026Estimating Uncoded Crash Factors with Tabular Foundation and System One Models: Kumo Tabular and Jevcited by 0
- 2026MotherTree: Meta-learning on synthetic data improves decision tree trainingcited by 0
- 2026MotherTree: Meta-learning on synthetic data improves decision tree training7 Oct 2026
- 2026Estimating Uncoded Crash Factors with Tabular Foundation and System One Models: Kumo Tabular and Jev7 Oct 2026
- 2026What You Observe Determines How You Identify Causal Effects: Evaluating Causal Models across Observational Views29 Sep 2026
- 2026PACE: Plug-and-Play Contextual Embedding for Feature Screening with Pretrained Tabular Foundation Models20 Sep 2026
- 2026Causilo Technical Report19 Sep 2026
- 2026Attention Quantization for Tabular Foundation Models11 Sep 2026
- 2026Do Tabular Foundation Models Know Physics? Contamination, Units, and the Deterministic Limit2 Sep 2026
- 2026The Illusion of Replacement: Rethinking Specialized Machine Learning Models in the Foundation Model Era29 Aug 2026
- 2026Advancing Open and Reproducible Relational Learning: RelArena-α, TabPFN-Rel and RPI17 Aug 2026
- 2026From field-scale to large-scale spectral libraries: Tabular foundation models in soil spectroscopy1 Aug 2026