Exploiting LLMs' Reasoning Capability to Infer Implicit Concepts in Legal Information Retrieval
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
Abstract (arXiv)
Statutory law retrieval is a typical problem in legal language processing, that has various practical applications in law engineering. Modern deep learning-based retrieval methods have achieved significant results for this problem. However, retrieval systems relying on semantic and lexical correlations often exhibit limitations, particularly when handling queries that involve real-life scenarios, or use the vocabulary that is not specific to the legal domain. In this work, we focus on overcoming this weaknesses by utilizing the logical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to identify relevant legal terms and facts related to the situation mentioned in the query. The proposed retrieval system integrates additional information from the term--based expansion and query reformulation to improve the retrieval accuracy. The experiments on COLIEE 2022 and COLIEE 2023 datasets show that extra knowledge from LLMs helps to improve the retrieval result of both lexical and semantic ranking models. The final ensemble retrieval system outperformed the highest results among all participating teams in the COLIEE 2022 and 2023 competitions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.
Builds on
17 of 38 references.
References · 17
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 810
- 2023Large Language Models in Law: A Surveycited by 128
- 2022Legal Prompting: Teaching a Language Model to Think Like a Lawyercited by 60
- 2023Query Expansion by Prompting Large Language Modelscited by 56
- 2022Legal Prompt Engineering for Multilingual Legal Judgement Predictioncited by 54
- 2023Benchmarking Machine Translation with Cultural Awarenesscited by 53
- 2023A Short Survey of Viewing Large Language Models in Legal Aspectcited by 51
- 2020BERT-QE: Contextualized Query Expansion for Document Re-rankingcited by 40
5 more
- 2024Can LLMs Reason with Rules? Logic Scaffolding for Stress-Testing and Improving LLMscited by 28
- 2023Legal Summarisation through LLMs: The PRODIGIT Projectcited by 10
- 2024LLaMandement: Large Language Models for Summarization of French Legislative Proposalscited by 9
- 2024CAPTAIN at COLIEE 2023: Efficient Methods for Legal Information Retrieval and Entailment Taskscited by 4
- 2023NOWJ1@ALQAC 2023: Enhancing Legal Task Performance with Classic Statistical Models and Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Elevating Legal LLM Responses: Harnessing Trainable Logical Structures and Semantic Knowledge with Legal Reasoning
- 2026Legal2LogicICL: Improving Generalization in Transforming Legal Cases to Logical Formulas via Diverse Few-Shot Learning
- 2025A Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmark
- 2023LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language Models
- 2025NOWJ@COLIEE 2025: A Multi-stage Framework Integrating Embedding Models and Large Language Models for Legal Retrieval and Entailment
- 2024Enabling Discriminative Reasoning in LLMs for Legal Judgment Prediction
- 2023One Law, Many Languages: Benchmarking Multilingual Legal Reasoning for Judicial Support
- 2025NitiBench: A Comprehensive Study of LLM Framework Capabilities for Thai Legal Question Answering