Deep Optimal Sensor Placement for Black Box Stochastic Simulations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Selecting cost-effective optimal sensor configurations for subsequent inference of parameters in black-box stochastic systems faces significant computational barriers. We propose a novel and robust approach, modelling the joint distribution over input parameters and solution with a joint energy-based model, trained on simulation data. Unlike existing simulation-based inference approaches, which must be tied to a specific set of point evaluations, we learn a functional representation of parameters and solution. This is used as a resolution-independent plug-and-play surrogate for the joint distribution, which can be conditioned over any set of points, permitting an efficient approach to sensor placement. We demonstrate the validity of our framework on a variety of stochastic problems, showing that our method provides highly informative sensor locations at a lower computational cost compared to conventional approaches.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2024.
Builds on
31 of 61 references.
References · 31
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
- 2020Improved Techniques for Training Score-Based Generative Modelscited by 1,043
- 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 502
- 2018Conditional Neural Processescited by 426
- 2021Neural Operator: Learning Maps Between Function Spacescited by 414
- 2018Sequential Neural Likelihood: Fast Likelihood-free Inference with Autoregressive Flowscited by 221
- 2023Modern Bayesian Experimental Designcited by 125
- 2019Variational Bayesian Optimal Experimental Designcited by 116
- 2021Deep Adaptive Design: Amortizing Sequential Bayesian Experimental Designcited by 106
19 more
- 2021Improved architectures and training algorithms for deep operator networkscited by 86
- 2023Operator Learning with Neural Fields: Tackling PDEs on General Geometriescited by 84
- 2017On Nesting Monte Carlo Estimatorscited by 83
- 2022COIN++: Neural Compression Across Modalitiescited by 82
- 2023Score-based Diffusion Models in Function Spacecited by 82
- 2023Neural Inverse Operators for Solving PDE Inverse Problemscited by 65
- 2019A Unified Stochastic Gradient Approach to Designing Bayesian-Optimal Experimentscited by 58
- 2022Generative Adversarial Neural Operatorscited by 52
- 2022Diffusion Generative Models in Infinite Dimensionscited by 49
- 2021Neural Stochastic PDEs: Resolution-Invariant Learning of Continuous Spatiotemporal Dynamicscited by 47
- 2023Infinite-Dimensional Diffusion Modelscited by 39
- 2023Continuous-Time Functional Diffusion Processescited by 39
- 2023Conditional score-based diffusion models for Bayesian inference in infinite dimensionscited by 38
- 2024Invertible Fourier Neural Operators for Tackling Both Forward and Inverse Problemscited by 19
- 2022Environmental Sensor Placement with Convolutional Gaussian Neural Processescited by 14
- 2020Energy-Based Processes for Exchangeable Datacited by 10
- 2023Energy Discrepancies: A Score-Independent Loss for Energy-Based Modelscited by 9
- 2022Design Amortization for Bayesian Optimal Experimental Designcited by 7
- 2022Energy-Based Models for Functional Data using Path Measure Tiltingcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.