mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generalization of Compositional Tasks with Logical Specification via Implicit Planning

arXiv 2410.09686 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2024cs.AI cs.SY eess.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this study, we address the challenge of learning generalizable policies for compositional tasks defined by logical specifications. These tasks consist of multiple temporally extended sub-tasks. Due to the sub-task inter-dependencies and sparse reward issue in long-horizon tasks, existing reinforcement learning (RL) approaches, such as task-conditioned and goal-conditioned policies, continue to struggle with slow convergence and sub-optimal performance in generalizing to compositional tasks. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a new hierarchical RL framework that enhances the efficiency and optimality of task generalization. At the high level, we present an implicit planner specifically designed for generalizing compositional tasks. This planner selects the next sub-task and estimates the multi-step return for completing the remaining task to complete from the current state. It learns a latent transition model and performs planning in the latent space by using a graph neural network (GNN). Subsequently, the high-level planner's selected sub-task guides the low-level agent to effectively handle long-horizon tasks, while the multi-step return encourages the low-level policy to account for future sub-task dependencies, enhancing its optimality. We conduct comprehensive experiments to demonstrate the framework's advantages over previous methods in terms of both efficiency and optimality.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2024.

Builds on

20 of 38 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  3. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
  4. 2019Contrastive Learning of Structured World Modelscited by 206
  5. 2016Modular Multitask Reinforcement Learning with Policy Sketchescited by 200
  6. 2020Reward Machines: Exploiting Reward Function Structure in Reinforcement Learningcited by 183
  7. 2022Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning: Problems and Solutionscited by 145
  8. 2021Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning with Imagined Subgoalscited by 129
  9. 2021LTL2Action: Generalizing LTL Instructions for Multi-Task RLcited by 72
  10. 2020A Composable Specification Language for Reinforcement Learning Taskscited by 68
  11. 2017Environment-Independent Task Specifications via GLTLcited by 67
  12. 2021Compositional Reinforcement Learning from Logical Specificationscited by 65
8 more
  1. 2020Plannable Approximations to MDP Homomorphisms: Equivariance under Actionscited by 61
  2. 2020Encoding formulas as deep networks: Reinforcement learning for zero-shot execution of LTL formulascited by 36
  3. 2021The Logical Options Frameworkcited by 24
  4. 2020Systematic Generalisation through Task Temporal Logic and Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  5. 2023Eventual Discounting Temporal Logic Counterfactual Experience Replaycited by 18
  6. 2021Active Hierarchical Exploration with Stable Subgoal Representation Learningcited by 17
  7. 2021In a Nutshell, the Human Asked for This: Latent Goals for Following Temporal Specificationscited by 17
  8. 2021MT* : Multi-Robot Path Planning for Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.