mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FAIREDU: A Multiple Regression-Based Method for Enhancing Fairness in Machine Learning Models for Educational Applications

arXiv 2410.06423 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness in artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) models is becoming critically important, especially as decisions made by these systems impact diverse groups. In education, a vital sector for all countries, the widespread application of AI/ML systems raises specific concerns regarding fairness. Current research predominantly focuses on fairness for individual sensitive features, which limits the comprehensiveness of fairness assessments. This paper introduces FAIREDU, a novel and effective method designed to improve fairness across multiple sensitive features. Through extensive experiments, we evaluate FAIREDU effectiveness in enhancing fairness without compromising model performance. The results demonstrate that FAIREDU addresses intersectionality across features such as gender, race, age, and other sensitive features, outperforming state-of-the-art methods with minimal effect on model accuracy. The paper also explores potential future research directions to enhance further the method robustness and applicability to various machine-learning models and datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2024.

Builds on

20 of 69 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
  4. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  5. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  6. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  7. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  8. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  9. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  10. 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
  11. 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 127
  12. 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
8 more
  1. 2021Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?cited by 93
  2. 2022Fairness Testing: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Trendscited by 62
  3. 2020Do the Machine Learning Models on a Crowd Sourced Platform Exhibit Bias? An Empirical Study on Model Fairnesscited by 52
  4. 2021Fair Preprocessing: Towards Understanding Compositional Fairness of Data Transformers in Machine Learning Pipelinecited by 49
  5. 2018How Do Fairness Definitions Fare? Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairnesscited by 48
  6. 2022Fairify: Fairness Verification of Neural Networkscited by 22
  7. 2021FairMask: Better Fairness via Model-based Rebalancing of Protected Attributescited by 19
  8. 2022Towards Understanding Fairness and its Composition in Ensemble Machine Learningcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.