Predicting Battery Capacity Fade Using Probabilistic Machine Learning Models With and Without Pre-Trained Priors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Lithium-ion batteries are a key energy storage technology driving revolutions in mobile electronics, electric vehicles and renewable energy storage. Capacity retention is a vital performance measure that is frequently utilized to assess whether these batteries have approached their end-of-life. Machine learning (ML) offers a powerful tool for predicting capacity degradation based on past data, and, potentially, prior physical knowledge, but the degree to which an ML prediction can be trusted is of significant practical importance in situations where consequential decisions must be made based on battery state of health. This study explores the efficacy of fully Bayesian machine learning in forecasting battery health with the quantification of uncertainty in its predictions. Specifically, we implemented three probabilistic ML approaches and evaluated the accuracy of their predictions and uncertainty estimates: a standard Gaussian process (GP), a structured Gaussian process (sGP), and a fully Bayesian neural network (BNN). In typical applications of GP and sGP, their hyperparameters are learned from a single sample while, in contrast, BNNs are typically pre-trained on an existing dataset to learn the weight distributions before being used for inference. This difference in methodology gives the BNN an advantage in learning global trends in a dataset and makes BNNs a good choice when training data is available. However, we show that pre-training can also be leveraged for GP and sGP approaches to learn the prior distributions of the hyperparameters and that in the case of the pre-trained sGP, similar accuracy and improved uncertainty estimation compared to the BNN can be achieved. This approach offers a framework for a broad range of probabilistic machine learning scenarios where past data is available and can be used to learn priors for (hyper)parameters of probabilistic ML models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2024.
Builds on
7 of 27 references.
References · 7
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
- 2021What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like?cited by 308
- 2017A Conceptual Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 209
- 2017Gaussian process regression for forecasting battery state of healthcited by 28
- 2022Bayesian Active Learning for Scanning Probe Microscopy: from Gaussian Processes to Hypothesis Learningcited by 16
- 2018Battery health prediction under generalized conditions using a Gaussian process transition modelcited by 10
- 2024Active Learning with Fully Bayesian Neural Networks for Discontinuous and Nonstationary Datacited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.