mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bayesian Active Learning for Scanning Probe Microscopy: from Gaussian Processes to Hypothesis Learning

arXiv 2205.15458 ↗First posted 30 May 2022cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.LGcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent progress in machine learning methods, and the emerging availability of programmable interfaces for scanning probe microscopes (SPMs), have propelled automated and autonomous microscopies to the forefront of attention of the scientific community. However, enabling automated microscopy requires the development of task-specific machine learning methods, understanding the interplay between physics discovery and machine learning, and fully defined discovery workflows. This, in turn, requires balancing the physical intuition and prior knowledge of the domain scientist with rewards that define experimental goals and machine learning algorithms that can translate these to specific experimental protocols. Here, we discuss the basic principles of Bayesian active learning and illustrate its applications for SPM. We progress from the Gaussian Process as a simple data-driven method and Bayesian inference for physical models as an extension of physics-based functional fits to more complex deep kernel learning methods, structured Gaussian Processes, and hypothesis learning. These frameworks allow for the use of prior data, the discovery of specific functionalities as encoded in spectral data, and exploration of physical laws manifesting during the experiment. The discussed framework can be universally applied to all techniques combining imaging and spectroscopy, SPM methods, nanoindentation, electron microscopy and spectroscopy, and chemical imaging methods, and can be particularly impactful for destructive or irreversible measurements.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 115 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2022.

Builds on

14 of 115 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  2. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  3. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  4. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
  5. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,054
  6. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
  7. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 744
  8. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 658
  9. 2018Pyro: Deep Universal Probabilistic Programmingcited by 380
  10. 2019Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Probabilistic Programming in NumPyrocited by 191
  11. 2020Understanding the Failure Modes of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 146
  12. 2013Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian modelscited by 52
2 more
  1. 2017Using stacking to average Bayesian predictive distributionscited by 39
  2. 2018Compressed Sensing of Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM) on Non-Rectangular Scanscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

16 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Deep Kernel Methods Learn Better: From Cards to Process Optimizationcited by 7
  2. 2023Discovery of structure-property relations for molecules via hypothesis-driven active learning over the chemical spacecited by 5
  3. 2024Unraveling the Impact of Initial Choices and In-Loop Interventions on Learning Dynamics in Autonomous Scanning Probe Microscopycited by 5
  4. 2024Bayesian Co-navigation: Dynamic Designing of the Materials Digital Twins via Active Learningcited by 5
  5. 2024Co-orchestration of Multiple Instruments to Uncover Structure-Property Relationships in Combinatorial Librariescited by 4
  6. 2025Beyond Optimization: Exploring Novelty Discovery in Autonomous Experimentscited by 4
  7. 2024Measurements with Noise: Bayesian Optimization for Co-optimizing Noise and Property Discovery in Automated Experimentscited by 3
  8. 2025X-Factor: Quality Is a Dataset-Intrinsic Propertycited by 3
  9. 2024Predicting Battery Capacity Fade Using Probabilistic Machine Learning Models With and Without Pre-Trained Priorscited by 0
  10. 2025Human-AI Synergy in Adaptive Active Learning for Continuous Lithium Carbonate Crystallization Optimizationcited by 0
  11. 2025DIVIDE: A Framework for Learning from Independent Multi-Mechanism Data Using Deep Encoders and Gaussian Processescited by 0
  12. 2026Novelty-Driven Target-Space Discovery in Automated Electron and Scanning Probe Microscopycited by 0
4 more
  1. 2026Quality-Controlled Active Learning via Gaussian Processes for Robust Structure-Property Learning in Autonomous Microscopycited by 0
  2. 2026PATHFINDER: Multi-objective discovery in structural and spectral spacescited by 0
  3. 2026Beyond Scalar Objectives: Expert-Feedback-Driven Autonomous Experimentation for Scientific Discovery at the Nanoscalecited by 0
  4. 2026STEMGym: Benchmarking Sequential Decision-Making under Dose Budgets in Autonomous Electron Microscopycited by 0