Active Learning with Fully Bayesian Neural Networks for Discontinuous and Nonstationary Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Active learning optimizes the exploration of large parameter spaces by strategically selecting which experiments or simulations to conduct, thus reducing resource consumption and potentially accelerating scientific discovery. A key component of this approach is a probabilistic surrogate model, typically a Gaussian Process (GP), which approximates an unknown functional relationship between control parameters and a target property. However, conventional GPs often struggle when applied to systems with discontinuities and non-stationarities, prompting the exploration of alternative models. This limitation becomes particularly relevant in physical science problems, which are often characterized by abrupt transitions between different system states and rapid changes in physical property behavior. Fully Bayesian Neural Networks (FBNNs) serve as a promising substitute, treating all neural network weights probabilistically and leveraging advanced Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques for direct sampling from the posterior distribution. This approach enables FBNNs to provide reliable predictive distributions, crucial for making informed decisions under uncertainty in the active learning setting. Although traditionally considered too computationally expensive for 'big data' applications, many physical sciences problems involve small amounts of data in relatively low-dimensional parameter spaces. Here, we assess the suitability and performance of FBNNs with the No-U-Turn Sampler for active learning tasks in the 'small data' regime, highlighting their potential to enhance predictive accuracy and reliability on test functions relevant to problems in physical sciences.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2024.
Builds on
15 of 35 references.
References · 15
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 819
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
- 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 445
- 2021What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like?cited by 308
- 2017A Conceptual Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 209
- 2019Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Probabilistic Programming in NumPyrocited by 191
- 2021The Promises and Pitfalls of Deep Kernel Learningcited by 81
- 2022Do Bayesian Neural Networks Need To Be Fully Stochastic?cited by 63
- 2023A Study of Bayesian Neural Network Surrogates for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 50
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024Fully Heteroscedastic Count Regression with Deep Double Poisson Networkscited by 3
- 2026NeuroSymActive: Differentiable Neural-Symbolic Reasoning with Active Exploration for Knowledge Graph Question Answeringcited by 3
- 2024Predicting Battery Capacity Fade Using Probabilistic Machine Learning Models With and Without Pre-Trained Priorscited by 0
- 2026NeuroSymActive: Differentiable Neural-Symbolic Reasoning with Active Exploration for Knowledge Graph Question Answering17 Feb 2026
- 2024Predicting Battery Capacity Fade Using Probabilistic Machine Learning Models With and Without Pre-Trained Priors8 Oct 2024
- 2024Fully Heteroscedastic Count Regression with Deep Double Poisson Networks13 Jun 2024